Autonomy and the Lawyer’s Role

This note examines the tension between autonomy and protection in adult social care law and practice. Drawing on the authors’ experiences and the legal frameworks governing care, support and mental capacity, it explores how efforts to promote welfare and manage risk may restrict autonomy and liberty. Particular attention is given to the role of local government lawyers in advising social work professionals on the legality, necessity and proportionality of interventions, and in shaping applications before the Court of Protection and under the High Court’s inherent jurisdiction. It argues that meaningful person-centred practice requires critical reflection of the exercise of power when balancing risk, protection and individual choice. Keywords: adult social care; Mental Capacity Act 2005; Care Act 2014; Court of Protection; inherent jurisdiction; safeguarding; autonomy; deprivation of liberty; fluctuating capacity; local authority lawyers.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Amicus Curiae
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14296/ac.v8i1.5966
Primary Topic
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Autonomy and the Lawyer’s Role

Bethane Harland, Iko Onuh-Goddard
1 links
Amicus Curiae
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
article

Autonomy and the Lawyer’s Role

Bethane Harland, Iko Onuh-Goddard
article en

Abstract

This note examines the tension between autonomy and protection in adult social care law and practice. Drawing on the authors’ experiences and the legal frameworks governing care, support and mental capacity, it explores how efforts to promote welfare and manage risk may restrict autonomy and liberty. Particular attention is given to the role of local government lawyers in advising social work professionals on the legality, necessity and proportionality of interventions, and in shaping applications before the Court of Protection and under the High Court’s inherent jurisdiction. It argues that meaningful person-centred practice requires critical reflection of the exercise of power when balancing risk, protection and individual choice. Keywords: adult social care; Mental Capacity Act 2005; Care Act 2014; Court of Protection; inherent jurisdiction; safeguarding; autonomy; deprivation of liberty; fluctuating capacity; local authority lawyers.

Amicus CuriaeVol. 8(1)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon