Time-Updated TNM Stage and Risk of Clinician-Documented Suicidal Ideation After Cancer Diagnosis: A Hospital-Based Cohort Study

Purpose: Suicide risk is elevated among patients with cancer, but how clinician-documented suicidal ideation varies across time-updated TNM stages remains unclear. We examined this association after cancer diagnosis. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 134,369 patients using tumor registry and clinical records from Yonsei Cancer Center covering 2005-2021. We identified clinician-documented suicidal ideation using rule-based keyword screening and manual contextual review of electronic medical records. TNM stage was classified as CIS or stages I-IV and updated across eligible intervals. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) using a marginal structural Cox model (MSM). Results: During follow-up, clinician-documented suicidal ideation was recorded in 6,718 patients (5.0%). Compared with TNM stage I, adjusted HRs were 0.81 (95% CI, 0.61-1.07) for CIS, 1.36 (1.25-1.49) for stage II, 1.20 (1.11-1.31) for stage III, and 1.54 (1.43-1.67) for stage IV. The stage III estimate was lower than the stage II estimate. Conclusion: Time-updated TNM stage was associated with clinician-documented suicidal ideation after cancer diagnosis, with the highest adjusted hazard observed for stage IV. These findings highlight the relevance of cancer-stage information to psychosocial assessment in cancer care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research and Treatment
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2026.0078
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Time-Updated TNM Stage and Risk of Clinician-Documented Suicidal Ideation After Cancer Diagnosis: A Hospital-Based Cohort Study

Minkyu Jung, Alexander C. Tsai, Jae Won Oh, Chun Il Park et al.
Cancer Research and Treatment
Cancer survivorship and care
article

Time-Updated TNM Stage and Risk of Clinician-Documented Suicidal Ideation After Cancer Diagnosis: A Hospital-Based Cohort Study

Minkyu Jung, Alexander C. Tsai, Jae Won Oh, Chun Il Park, Doo Woong Lee, Nak-Hoon Son, San Lee, Ji Hyun Lee
article en

Abstract

Purpose: Suicide risk is elevated among patients with cancer, but how clinician-documented suicidal ideation varies across time-updated TNM stages remains unclear. We examined this association after cancer diagnosis. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 134,369 patients using tumor registry and clinical records from Yonsei Cancer Center covering 2005-2021. We identified clinician-documented suicidal ideation using rule-based keyword screening and manual contextual review of electronic medical records. TNM stage was classified as CIS or stages I-IV and updated across eligible intervals. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) using a marginal structural Cox model (MSM). Results: During follow-up, clinician-documented suicidal ideation was recorded in 6,718 patients (5.0%). Compared with TNM stage I, adjusted HRs were 0.81 (95% CI, 0.61-1.07) for CIS, 1.36 (1.25-1.49) for stage II, 1.20 (1.11-1.31) for stage III, and 1.54 (1.43-1.67) for stage IV. The stage III estimate was lower than the stage II estimate. Conclusion: Time-updated TNM stage was associated with clinician-documented suicidal ideation after cancer diagnosis, with the highest adjusted hazard observed for stage IV. These findings highlight the relevance of cancer-stage information to psychosocial assessment in cancer care.

Cancer Research and Treatment
Harvard University (US), Yonsei University (KR), University of Utah (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Yonsei University Health System (KR), Yonsei Cancer Hospital (KR), The Catholic University of Korea Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital (KR), Keimyung University (KR), Catholic University of Korea (KR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon