Between Institutional Conservation and Peasant Strategies: Local Practices for Managing Human-Wildlife Conflicts Around Comoé National Park

Around Comoé National Park, wildlife incursions into agricultural lands create tension between institutional conservation goals and the preservation of livelihoods for local communities. This study analyzes local practices for managing human-wildlife conflicts and how they relate to institutional mechanisms for biodiversity protection. It is based on a qualitative and comprehensive approach, conducted with 45 participants selected through purposive sampling in nine villages in the Bouna, Nassian, and Dabakala sectors.The data collected through semi-structured interviews, field observations, and literature review, were subjected to thematic content analysis and triangulation The results reveal a variety of farmer strategies involving field surveillance, scarecrows, sound devices, used mosquito nets, and smoke, as well as trapping and killing animals. These practices reflect trade-offs between crop protection, food security, and compliance with hunting bans. Their effectiveness remains limited by the persistence of incursions. According to respondents, inadequate institutional responses, the absence of compensation, and a lack of training undermine reporting efforts and cooperation with park managers. Village conservation and development associations, however, provide forums for collaboration on monitoring and combating poaching. The study highlights the need for a collaborative management approach that combines recognition of farmers’ traditional knowledge, technical support, and consideration of agricultural damage, to reconcile wildlife conservation with the security of livelihoods. Key words: Human-wildlife conflicts; farmer strategies; institutional conservation; local governance; Comoé National Park. Received Date: September 17, 2026 Accepted Date: October 09, 2026 Published Date: November 01, 2026 Available Online at: https://www.ijsrisjournal.com/index.php/ojsfiles/article/view/1042

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Scientific Research and Innovative Studies
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63883/ijsrisjournal.v5i6.1042
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Between Institutional Conservation and Peasant Strategies: Local Practices for Managing Human-Wildlife Conflicts Around Comoé National Park

Guy Eric Anicet Quassy Kouakou, Anzian KOUACOU, Dokafolo Brahima SEKONGO
International Journal of Scientific Research and Innovative Studies
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Between Institutional Conservation and Peasant Strategies: Local Practices for Managing Human-Wildlife Conflicts Around Comoé National Park

Guy Eric Anicet Quassy Kouakou, Anzian KOUACOU, Dokafolo Brahima SEKONGO
article en

Abstract

Around Comoé National Park, wildlife incursions into agricultural lands create tension between institutional conservation goals and the preservation of livelihoods for local communities. This study analyzes local practices for managing human-wildlife conflicts and how they relate to institutional mechanisms for biodiversity protection. It is based on a qualitative and comprehensive approach, conducted with 45 participants selected through purposive sampling in nine villages in the Bouna, Nassian, and Dabakala sectors.The data collected through semi-structured interviews, field observations, and literature review, were subjected to thematic content analysis and triangulation The results reveal a variety of farmer strategies involving field surveillance, scarecrows, sound devices, used mosquito nets, and smoke, as well as trapping and killing animals. These practices reflect trade-offs between crop protection, food security, and compliance with hunting bans. Their effectiveness remains limited by the persistence of incursions. According to respondents, inadequate institutional responses, the absence of compensation, and a lack of training undermine reporting efforts and cooperation with park managers. Village conservation and development associations, however, provide forums for collaboration on monitoring and combating poaching. The study highlights the need for a collaborative management approach that combines recognition of farmers’ traditional knowledge, technical support, and consideration of agricultural damage, to reconcile wildlife conservation with the security of livelihoods. Key words: Human-wildlife conflicts; farmer strategies; institutional conservation; local governance; Comoé National Park. Received Date: September 17, 2026 Accepted Date: October 09, 2026 Published Date: November 01, 2026 Available Online at: https://www.ijsrisjournal.com/index.php/ojsfiles/article/view/1042

International Journal of Scientific Research and Innovative StudiesVol. 5(6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon