Navigating the science-policy interface: climate scientists' role conceptions and engagement practices

Effective climate change response requires constructive science-policy engagement, yet what role interpretations climate scientists hold at the science-policy interface, which factors shape these interpretations, and how they relate to actual communication behaviour remain empirically underexplored. We surveyed German climate scientists (N = 249) and identified five distinct profiles: Advocating Brokers, Engaged Advocates, Reserved Academics, Policy Advisors, and Traditional Academics. Notably, the latter group --- preferring detachment from societal and policy engagement --- represents only a small minority. These findings provide insights into the ways scientists navigate their engagement at the science-policy boundary, contributing to the ongoing discourse on scientific advocacy in post-normal science contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Science Communication
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22323/171720260815152417
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating the science-policy interface: climate scientists' role conceptions and engagement practices

Hannah Schmid-Petri, Stephan Schlögl, Paula Kolhep
2 links
Journal of Science Communication
Climate Change Communication and Perception
article

Navigating the science-policy interface: climate scientists' role conceptions and engagement practices

Hannah Schmid-Petri, Stephan Schlögl, Paula Kolhep
article en

Abstract

Effective climate change response requires constructive science-policy engagement, yet what role interpretations climate scientists hold at the science-policy interface, which factors shape these interpretations, and how they relate to actual communication behaviour remain empirically underexplored. We surveyed German climate scientists (N = 249) and identified five distinct profiles: Advocating Brokers, Engaged Advocates, Reserved Academics, Policy Advisors, and Traditional Academics. Notably, the latter group --- preferring detachment from societal and policy engagement --- represents only a small minority. These findings provide insights into the ways scientists navigate their engagement at the science-policy boundary, contributing to the ongoing discourse on scientific advocacy in post-normal science contexts.

Journal of Science CommunicationVol. 25(7)
University of Passau (DE)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon