Probing Bimetallicity in Catalytic Systems: A Practical Tutorial on Advanced Analytical Tools

Abstract Bimetallic catalysts provide a versatile platform for tuning catalytic activity, selectivity, and stability through metal–metal interactions, electronic modification, geometric/ensemble effects, and dynamic restructuring under reaction conditions. However, establishing their working structure is challenging because the two metals may form alloys, solid solutions, intermetallic phases, Janus particles, core–shell structures, segregated domains, or partially oxidized surface species. This Tutorial Review introduces advanced analytical tools and complementary computational approaches for assessing bimetallicity, emphasizing the capabilities and limitations of each method. The discussion first outlines the structural complexity of bimetallic catalysts and the thermodynamic and kinetic factors that influence alloying, segregation, particle size, and surface composition, including the dynamic evolution of subnanometer-sized clusters. It then compares bulk, surface-sensitive, local-coordination, imaging, and adsorbate-probe methods, including X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM), selected-area electron diffraction (SAED), infrared spectroscopy, chemisorption, temperature-programmed desorption/reduction (TPD/TPR), and in situ/operando approaches. Representative studies demonstrate why individual signatures, such as diffraction peak shifts, binding energy changes, lattice fringes, or CO adsorption bands, should not be interpreted in isolation. A dedicated Perspective distinguishes structural evidence of bimetallicity from demonstrations of catalytic synergism and discusses how controlled comparisons link working-state descriptors with kinetic and performance metrics, including turnover frequency, apparent activation energy, reaction order, selectivity, stability, and regenerability. Overall, this Tutorial Review provides a practical framework for selecting complementary characterization methods and building reliable structure-kinetics-performance relationships to guide bimetallic catalyst design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Engineering Au
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsengineeringau.6c00060
Primary Topic
Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Probing Bimetallicity in Catalytic Systems: A Practical Tutorial on Advanced Analytical Tools

Kyriaki Polychronopoulou, Maguy Abi Jaoudé, Sara AlKhoori, Samuel S. Mao et al.
1 links
ACS Engineering Au
Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
article

Probing Bimetallicity in Catalytic Systems: A Practical Tutorial on Advanced Analytical Tools

Kyriaki Polychronopoulou, Maguy Abi Jaoudé, Sara AlKhoori, Samuel S. Mao, Swati Singh, Mariam Ahmed Mohammed
article en

Abstract

Abstract Bimetallic catalysts provide a versatile platform for tuning catalytic activity, selectivity, and stability through metal–metal interactions, electronic modification, geometric/ensemble effects, and dynamic restructuring under reaction conditions. However, establishing their working structure is challenging because the two metals may form alloys, solid solutions, intermetallic phases, Janus particles, core–shell structures, segregated domains, or partially oxidized surface species. This Tutorial Review introduces advanced analytical tools and complementary computational approaches for assessing bimetallicity, emphasizing the capabilities and limitations of each method. The discussion first outlines the structural complexity of bimetallic catalysts and the thermodynamic and kinetic factors that influence alloying, segregation, particle size, and surface composition, including the dynamic evolution of subnanometer-sized clusters. It then compares bulk, surface-sensitive, local-coordination, imaging, and adsorbate-probe methods, including X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM), selected-area electron diffraction (SAED), infrared spectroscopy, chemisorption, temperature-programmed desorption/reduction (TPD/TPR), and in situ/operando approaches. Representative studies demonstrate why individual signatures, such as diffraction peak shifts, binding energy changes, lattice fringes, or CO adsorption bands, should not be interpreted in isolation. A dedicated Perspective distinguishes structural evidence of bimetallicity from demonstrations of catalytic synergism and discusses how controlled comparisons link working-state descriptors with kinetic and performance metrics, including turnover frequency, apparent activation energy, reaction order, selectivity, stability, and regenerability. Overall, this Tutorial Review provides a practical framework for selecting complementary characterization methods and building reliable structure-kinetics-performance relationships to guide bimetallic catalyst design.

ACS Engineering Au
Khalifa University of Science and Technology (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon