Implementing sustainable mentorship in midwifery: A scoping review of barriers and enablers

PROBLEM: Mentorship is recognised as an important strategy to support transition to practice, professional development and workforce retention in midwifery. However, little is known about the barriers and enablers influencing the implementation and sustainability of mentorship programmes. BACKGROUND: Midwifery workforce shortages, burnout and attrition continue to challenge maternity services internationally. Although mentorship is increasingly promoted to support midwives, the organisational and structural conditions required for sustainable mentorship remain unclear. AIM: To identify and synthesise the barriers and enablers influencing the implementation and sustainability of mentorship in midwifery. METHODS: A scoping review was undertaken using the framework described by Arksey and O'Malley and reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidance. Electronic database searches were conducted in CINAHL, MEDLINE and Scopus. Studies were screened against predetermined inclusion criteria, and data were charted and synthesised descriptively. FINDINGS: Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Two overarching themes were identified: (1) organisational commitment and leadership as the foundation for sustainable mentorship and (2) formalised programme structures as enablers of effective mentorship implementation. Key enablers included leadership engagement, protected time, funding, mentor training, structured programme frameworks, mentor-mentee matching and programme evaluation. Barriers included workload pressures, limited organisational support, staffing shortages, lack of protected time and poorly defined programme structures. DISCUSSION: Mentorship programmes were most effective when embedded within organisational systems and supported through leadership, governance and structured programme design. CONCLUSION: Sustainable mentorship in midwifery requires coordinated organisational investment, leadership engagement and formalised programme structures. Further research is needed to examine organisational and leadership perspectives on mentorship implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Women and Birth
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2026.102430
Primary Topic
Mentoring and Academic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementing sustainable mentorship in midwifery: A scoping review of barriers and enablers

Lisa Charmer, Sara J. Bayes, Dianne Bloxsome, Georgie Haver et al.
1 links
Women and Birth
Mentoring and Academic Development
article

Implementing sustainable mentorship in midwifery: A scoping review of barriers and enablers

Lisa Charmer, Sara J. Bayes, Dianne Bloxsome, Georgie Haver, Christine Catling
article en

Abstract

PROBLEM: Mentorship is recognised as an important strategy to support transition to practice, professional development and workforce retention in midwifery. However, little is known about the barriers and enablers influencing the implementation and sustainability of mentorship programmes. BACKGROUND: Midwifery workforce shortages, burnout and attrition continue to challenge maternity services internationally. Although mentorship is increasingly promoted to support midwives, the organisational and structural conditions required for sustainable mentorship remain unclear. AIM: To identify and synthesise the barriers and enablers influencing the implementation and sustainability of mentorship in midwifery. METHODS: A scoping review was undertaken using the framework described by Arksey and O'Malley and reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidance. Electronic database searches were conducted in CINAHL, MEDLINE and Scopus. Studies were screened against predetermined inclusion criteria, and data were charted and synthesised descriptively. FINDINGS: Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Two overarching themes were identified: (1) organisational commitment and leadership as the foundation for sustainable mentorship and (2) formalised programme structures as enablers of effective mentorship implementation. Key enablers included leadership engagement, protected time, funding, mentor training, structured programme frameworks, mentor-mentee matching and programme evaluation. Barriers included workload pressures, limited organisational support, staffing shortages, lack of protected time and poorly defined programme structures. DISCUSSION: Mentorship programmes were most effective when embedded within organisational systems and supported through leadership, governance and structured programme design. CONCLUSION: Sustainable mentorship in midwifery requires coordinated organisational investment, leadership engagement and formalised programme structures. Further research is needed to examine organisational and leadership perspectives on mentorship implementation.

Women and BirthVol. 39(6)
University of Technology Sydney (AU), Edith Cowan University (AU), Lismore Base Hospital (AU), South Metropolitan Health Service (AU), Southern Cross University (AU), Australian Catholic University (AU), The University of Notre Dame Australia (AU)
Good health and well-being, Decent work and economic growth, Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Mentoring and Academic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon