Interventions That Aim to Impact the Research Activity of Point-of-Care Nurses and Allied Health Professionals (AHPs): A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Substantive evidence related to barriers and enablers that impact the research activity of nurses and allied health professionals (AHPs) exists; however, less is known about the components and impact of interventions that influence research activity. This scoping review synthesizes empirical evidence on interventions designed to impact research activity among point-of-care nurses and AHPs within hospital and healthcare settings. METHODS: This scoping review was conducted in accordance with Arksey and O'Malley's framework. Primary, peer-reviewed studies describing an intervention focused on increasing research activity among postlicensure nurses and/or AHPs in CINAHL, Embase, and MEDLINE published between January 1, 2013, and May 2, 2024 were included. Abstracts and full texts were screened by 2 reviewers, and data extracted included study details, intervention details, and outcomes. RESULTS: Among the 43 studies that were included, interventions were commonly multicomponent, frequently coupled with education or training. Core components included research support, mentorship, collaborative activities, academic partnerships, and funding. Multicomponent, evidence-informed interventions were most frequently associated with research-related outcomes. Mentorship and protected time were consistently linked to addressing key persistent barriers, such as skill gaps and clinical workload. Sustained activity was commonly associated with intrinsic motivation and alignment with professional identity. CONCLUSIONS: Reported outcomes demonstrated improvements in individual research knowledge, skills, and confidence; strengthened organizational research culture and infrastructure; and increased individual and organizational research productivity. Healthcare organizations should consider implementing multicomponent interventions to increase research activity among point-of-care nurses and AHPs, recognizing that research-engaged clinicians are essential for evidence-based care and knowledge generation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quality Management in Health Care
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/qmh.0000000000000597
Primary Topic
Health and Medical Research Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interventions That Aim to Impact the Research Activity of Point-of-Care Nurses and Allied Health Professionals (AHPs): A Scoping Review

Daniela Bellicoso, Arlinda Ruco, Christy Costanian, Chaitali Desai et al.
1 links
Quality Management in Health Care
Health and Medical Research Impacts
article

Interventions That Aim to Impact the Research Activity of Point-of-Care Nurses and Allied Health Professionals (AHPs): A Scoping Review

Daniela Bellicoso, Arlinda Ruco, Christy Costanian, Chaitali Desai, Lianne P. Jeffs, Whitney Blair Berta, Safora Johansen, Jaylyn Leighton, Lisa Di Prospero, Bisma Imtiaz, Tharsiga Gunasegaran, Sara Morassaei, Morgann Reid
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Substantive evidence related to barriers and enablers that impact the research activity of nurses and allied health professionals (AHPs) exists; however, less is known about the components and impact of interventions that influence research activity. This scoping review synthesizes empirical evidence on interventions designed to impact research activity among point-of-care nurses and AHPs within hospital and healthcare settings. METHODS: This scoping review was conducted in accordance with Arksey and O'Malley's framework. Primary, peer-reviewed studies describing an intervention focused on increasing research activity among postlicensure nurses and/or AHPs in CINAHL, Embase, and MEDLINE published between January 1, 2013, and May 2, 2024 were included. Abstracts and full texts were screened by 2 reviewers, and data extracted included study details, intervention details, and outcomes. RESULTS: Among the 43 studies that were included, interventions were commonly multicomponent, frequently coupled with education or training. Core components included research support, mentorship, collaborative activities, academic partnerships, and funding. Multicomponent, evidence-informed interventions were most frequently associated with research-related outcomes. Mentorship and protected time were consistently linked to addressing key persistent barriers, such as skill gaps and clinical workload. Sustained activity was commonly associated with intrinsic motivation and alignment with professional identity. CONCLUSIONS: Reported outcomes demonstrated improvements in individual research knowledge, skills, and confidence; strengthened organizational research culture and infrastructure; and increased individual and organizational research productivity. Healthcare organizations should consider implementing multicomponent interventions to increase research activity among point-of-care nurses and AHPs, recognizing that research-engaged clinicians are essential for evidence-based care and knowledge generation.

Quality Management in Health Care
St. Michael's Hospital (CA), Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA), University Health Network (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Queen's University (CA), Bruyère (CA), Unity Health Toronto (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Health and Medical Research Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon