Comparative Evaluation of Orthognathic Surgery with and without PreSurgical Orthodontics in Skeletal Class III Patients: Clinical, Functional and Patient-Reported Outcomes

Background: Skeletal Class III malocclusion is a dentofacial deformity that may require orthognathic surgery to correct maxillomandibular discrepancies. Presurgical orthodontics is traditionally performed before surgery, whereas the surgeryfirst approach omits this preparatory phase. Objectives: To compare clinical, functional, and patient-reported outcomes of orthognathic surgery with and without presurgical orthodontic treatment in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion. Study Design & Setting: Comparative study conducted at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Shahida Islam Medical & Dental College (SIMDC) from February 2026 to July 2026. Methodology: A total of 120 patients were divided into two groups of 60 each. Group A underwent conventional orthognathic surgery preceded by presurgical orthodontics, whereas Group B underwent the surgery-first approach. Clinical, functional, and patient-reported outcomes were assessed using clinical examination, cephalometric measurements, maximum interincisal opening, masticatory function assessment, and the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14). Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 26, with p≤0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: The mean total treatment duration was 22.6 ± 4.1 months in Group A and 16.8 ± 3.7 months in Group B (p<0.001). At six months, mean postoperative overjet was 2.1 ± 0.8 mm and 2.0 ± 0.7 mm, respectively (p=0.463). Maximum interincisal opening was 39.2 ± 4.8 mm in Group A and 40.5 ± 4.6 mm in Group B (p=0.127). Mean OHIP-14 scores were 10.8 ± 4.1 and 9.6 ± 3.8, respectively (p=0.098). Postoperative complications occurred in 23.3% and 26.7% of patients, respectively (p=0.672). Conclusion: The surgery-first approach was associated with shorter total treatment duration, while the measured clinical, functional, and patient-reported outcomes were broadly comparable between groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Drug Delivery Technology
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25258/ijddt.16.87s.27
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Evaluation of Orthognathic Surgery with and without PreSurgical Orthodontics in Skeletal Class III Patients: Clinical, Functional and Patient-Reported Outcomes

Muhammad Junaid Hashmi, Ahsan Khalid, Zainab Hayyat Raja, Hafiz Nasir Mahmood et al.
International Journal of Drug Delivery Technology
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Comparative Evaluation of Orthognathic Surgery with and without PreSurgical Orthodontics in Skeletal Class III Patients: Clinical, Functional and Patient-Reported Outcomes

Muhammad Junaid Hashmi, Ahsan Khalid, Zainab Hayyat Raja, Hafiz Nasir Mahmood, Shumaila Abdul Haq, Muhammad Ammar Riaz
article en

Abstract

Background: Skeletal Class III malocclusion is a dentofacial deformity that may require orthognathic surgery to correct maxillomandibular discrepancies. Presurgical orthodontics is traditionally performed before surgery, whereas the surgeryfirst approach omits this preparatory phase. Objectives: To compare clinical, functional, and patient-reported outcomes of orthognathic surgery with and without presurgical orthodontic treatment in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion. Study Design & Setting: Comparative study conducted at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Shahida Islam Medical & Dental College (SIMDC) from February 2026 to July 2026. Methodology: A total of 120 patients were divided into two groups of 60 each. Group A underwent conventional orthognathic surgery preceded by presurgical orthodontics, whereas Group B underwent the surgery-first approach. Clinical, functional, and patient-reported outcomes were assessed using clinical examination, cephalometric measurements, maximum interincisal opening, masticatory function assessment, and the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14). Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 26, with p≤0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: The mean total treatment duration was 22.6 ± 4.1 months in Group A and 16.8 ± 3.7 months in Group B (p<0.001). At six months, mean postoperative overjet was 2.1 ± 0.8 mm and 2.0 ± 0.7 mm, respectively (p=0.463). Maximum interincisal opening was 39.2 ± 4.8 mm in Group A and 40.5 ± 4.6 mm in Group B (p=0.127). Mean OHIP-14 scores were 10.8 ± 4.1 and 9.6 ± 3.8, respectively (p=0.098). Postoperative complications occurred in 23.3% and 26.7% of patients, respectively (p=0.672). Conclusion: The surgery-first approach was associated with shorter total treatment duration, while the measured clinical, functional, and patient-reported outcomes were broadly comparable between groups.

International Journal of Drug Delivery TechnologyVol. 16(87s)
CMH Lahore Medical College and Institute of Dentistry (PK), Shahida Islam Medical and Dental (PK)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon