Influence of Cell Type, Label Type, and Recovery Times on In-Cell Pulsed Dipolar Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Data

Abstract In nature, most biomolecules perform their function in a cellular environment. It is therefore important to study their structure–dynamics–function relationships in cells and establish methods that can achieve this. Here, the suitability of pulsed dipolar electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy (PDS) for such studies is tested in combination with different label and cell types. The model protein GB1 was labeled with either a trityl- or gadolinium-based spin label and transfected via electroporation into two types of mammalian cells, i.e., HeLa and HEK293, and one type of bacterial cells, i.e., E . coli . The in-cell Q-band PDS measurements revealed that both labels remain intact in all three cell types, whereas unspecific binding to the tested cell types was observed for the trityl-labeled protein when used in high concentrations, no such behavior was detectable for the gadolinium label due to its significantly lower sensitivity at Q-band. Interestingly, the modulation depth decreased for both labels with increasing cell recovery time, potentially indicating intracellular protein degradation or aggregation processes. In contrast, E . coli enabled substantially shorter recovery times and yielded PDS data with preserved modulation depth and distance information. Thus, in-cell PDS studies on spin-labeled proteins are particularly useful when combined with E . coli cells.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Magnetic Resonance
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00723-026-01889-x
Primary Topic
Electron Spin Resonance Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of Cell Type, Label Type, and Recovery Times on In-Cell Pulsed Dipolar Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Data

Olav Schiemann, Katrin Paeschke, Philipp Schult, Bela E. Bode et al.
1 links
Applied Magnetic Resonance
Electron Spin Resonance Studies
article

Influence of Cell Type, Label Type, and Recovery Times on In-Cell Pulsed Dipolar Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Data

Olav Schiemann, Katrin Paeschke, Philipp Schult, Bela E. Bode, Yannik Limbach
article en

Abstract

Abstract In nature, most biomolecules perform their function in a cellular environment. It is therefore important to study their structure–dynamics–function relationships in cells and establish methods that can achieve this. Here, the suitability of pulsed dipolar electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy (PDS) for such studies is tested in combination with different label and cell types. The model protein GB1 was labeled with either a trityl- or gadolinium-based spin label and transfected via electroporation into two types of mammalian cells, i.e., HeLa and HEK293, and one type of bacterial cells, i.e., E . coli . The in-cell Q-band PDS measurements revealed that both labels remain intact in all three cell types, whereas unspecific binding to the tested cell types was observed for the trityl-labeled protein when used in high concentrations, no such behavior was detectable for the gadolinium label due to its significantly lower sensitivity at Q-band. Interestingly, the modulation depth decreased for both labels with increasing cell recovery time, potentially indicating intracellular protein degradation or aggregation processes. In contrast, E . coli enabled substantially shorter recovery times and yielded PDS data with preserved modulation depth and distance information. Thus, in-cell PDS studies on spin-labeled proteins are particularly useful when combined with E . coli cells.

Applied Magnetic ResonanceVol. 57(11-12)
University of Bonn (DE), University of St Andrews (GB), University Hospital Bonn (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Electron Spin Resonance Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon