A Study on the Prevalence of Fungal Isolates Among Rhinosinusitis Patients at CMCH, Coimbatore

Background and Objectives: Fungal rhinosinusitis may present as allergic disease, a non-invasive fungal ball, or infection involving the surrounding tissues. This study examined the fungal species recovered from patients with rhinosinusitis, the types of fungal disease encountered, associated clinical conditions, and antifungal susceptibility findings. Methods: This prospective hospital-based study included 106 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis who underwent diagnostic nasal endoscopy and/or functional endoscopic sinus surgery at Coimbatore Medical College Hospital. Samples were examined by potassium hydroxide microscopy, fungal culture, and histopathology. Amphotericin B minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were measured by broth microdilution and Etest. Voriconazole MICs were also assessed for Aspergillus isolates. Results: Fungal rhinosinusitis was identified in 22 of 106 patients (20.8%). Of these 22 cases, 15 (68.2%) had allergic fungal rhinosinusitis, three (13.6%) had chronic invasive disease, two (9.1%) had acute invasive disease, and one each (4.5%) had a fungal ball or chronic granulomatous disease. Aspergillus flavus was the commonest isolate (11/22; 50%). KOH microscopy was positive in 21 cases and histopathology in 17. Asthma or diabetes was recorded in 15 of 22 fungal cases and 19 of 84 non-fungal cases. Conclusion: Fungal rhinosinusitis was found in about one in five patients in this selected endoscopic and surgical cohort, most often in its allergic form. Microscopy, culture, and histopathology should be interpreted together. Antifungal MIC results need careful interpretation because validated species-specific clinical breakpoints are not always available.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATIONS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61770/nbejms.2026.v04.i11.017
Primary Topic
Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Study on the Prevalence of Fungal Isolates Among Rhinosinusitis Patients at CMCH, Coimbatore

N. Vandarkuzhali, M. Meena, R. Aravind
NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATIONS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES
Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
article

A Study on the Prevalence of Fungal Isolates Among Rhinosinusitis Patients at CMCH, Coimbatore

N. Vandarkuzhali, M. Meena, R. Aravind
article en

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Fungal rhinosinusitis may present as allergic disease, a non-invasive fungal ball, or infection involving the surrounding tissues. This study examined the fungal species recovered from patients with rhinosinusitis, the types of fungal disease encountered, associated clinical conditions, and antifungal susceptibility findings. Methods: This prospective hospital-based study included 106 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis who underwent diagnostic nasal endoscopy and/or functional endoscopic sinus surgery at Coimbatore Medical College Hospital. Samples were examined by potassium hydroxide microscopy, fungal culture, and histopathology. Amphotericin B minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were measured by broth microdilution and Etest. Voriconazole MICs were also assessed for Aspergillus isolates. Results: Fungal rhinosinusitis was identified in 22 of 106 patients (20.8%). Of these 22 cases, 15 (68.2%) had allergic fungal rhinosinusitis, three (13.6%) had chronic invasive disease, two (9.1%) had acute invasive disease, and one each (4.5%) had a fungal ball or chronic granulomatous disease. Aspergillus flavus was the commonest isolate (11/22; 50%). KOH microscopy was positive in 21 cases and histopathology in 17. Asthma or diabetes was recorded in 15 of 22 fungal cases and 19 of 84 non-fungal cases. Conclusion: Fungal rhinosinusitis was found in about one in five patients in this selected endoscopic and surgical cohort, most often in its allergic form. Microscopy, culture, and histopathology should be interpreted together. Antifungal MIC results need careful interpretation because validated species-specific clinical breakpoints are not always available.

NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATIONS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCESVol. 4(11)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon