Acceptance and use of online learning environments in higher education: Scale development and UTAUT model testing

This study examined the acceptance and use of online learning environments among higher education students through the lens of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). Drawing on a sample of 959 university students, the study validated an Online Learning Environments Acceptance and Use Scale developed in the present study and tested the hypothesized UTAUT structural model. Confirmatory factor analysis with robust maximum likelihood estimation supported a five-factor acceptance structure comprising performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, and behavioral intention, with actual use modeled as a separate behavioral criterion. The five acceptance factors showed strong convergent validity (AVE = .61–.78; CR = .86–.94) and adequate model fit (CFI = .931; TLI = .917; RMSEA = .090, 90% CI [.085, .096]; SRMR = .065). The structural model indicated that performance expectancy (β = .61, p < .001), social influence (β = .21, p < .001), and effort expectancy (β = .11, p = .004) significantly predicted behavioral intention, explaining 67.5% of its variance. Facilitating conditions significantly predicted actual use (β = .15, p < .001), whereas the path from behavioral intention to use was non-significant (β = .07, p= .103). Findings are interpreted in light of the mandatory nature of the online-only courses examined, in which students had no face-to-face alternative, and contribute a validated, context-sensitive instrument to the technology acceptance literature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pedagogical Research
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33902/jpr.202647436
Primary Topic
Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acceptance and use of online learning environments in higher education: Scale development and UTAUT model testing

Şule Betül Tosuntaş
2 links
Journal of Pedagogical Research
Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
article

Acceptance and use of online learning environments in higher education: Scale development and UTAUT model testing

Şule Betül Tosuntaş
article en

Abstract

This study examined the acceptance and use of online learning environments among higher education students through the lens of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). Drawing on a sample of 959 university students, the study validated an Online Learning Environments Acceptance and Use Scale developed in the present study and tested the hypothesized UTAUT structural model. Confirmatory factor analysis with robust maximum likelihood estimation supported a five-factor acceptance structure comprising performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, and behavioral intention, with actual use modeled as a separate behavioral criterion. The five acceptance factors showed strong convergent validity (AVE = .61–.78; CR = .86–.94) and adequate model fit (CFI = .931; TLI = .917; RMSEA = .090, 90% CI [.085, .096]; SRMR = .065). The structural model indicated that performance expectancy (β = .61, p < .001), social influence (β = .21, p < .001), and effort expectancy (β = .11, p = .004) significantly predicted behavioral intention, explaining 67.5% of its variance. Facilitating conditions significantly predicted actual use (β = .15, p < .001), whereas the path from behavioral intention to use was non-significant (β = .07, p= .103). Findings are interpreted in light of the mandatory nature of the online-only courses examined, in which students had no face-to-face alternative, and contribute a validated, context-sensitive instrument to the technology acceptance literature.

Journal of Pedagogical Research
Bursa Uludağ Üni̇versi̇tesi̇ (TR)
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon