Inclusionary geoeconomics and the reproduction of U.S. hegemony in Egypt

Egypt occupies a central position in the U.S.-led Middle Eastern order. This article examines U.S. policy toward Egypt since 2015 through inclusionary geoeconomics, arguing that economic instruments reproduce hegemony by organizing dependence and institutionalizing alignment and order maintenance. Foreign aid, military financing, defense procurement, multilateral finance, trade, investment, and conditionality connect Egypt, particularly its military establishment, to U.S.-led security and economic structures. These mechanisms operate through institutionalized conditionality, structural dependence, and system-level integration. While they do not eliminate Egyptian agency, they structure the conditions under which policy choices are made in a strategically vital regional setting within the U.S.-led order.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Comparative Strategy
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01495933.2026.2724280
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inclusionary geoeconomics and the reproduction of U.S. hegemony in Egypt

Mustafa Şahin
Comparative Strategy
International Relations and Foreign Policy
article

Inclusionary geoeconomics and the reproduction of U.S. hegemony in Egypt

Mustafa Şahin
article en

Abstract

Egypt occupies a central position in the U.S.-led Middle Eastern order. This article examines U.S. policy toward Egypt since 2015 through inclusionary geoeconomics, arguing that economic instruments reproduce hegemony by organizing dependence and institutionalizing alignment and order maintenance. Foreign aid, military financing, defense procurement, multilateral finance, trade, investment, and conditionality connect Egypt, particularly its military establishment, to U.S.-led security and economic structures. These mechanisms operate through institutionalized conditionality, structural dependence, and system-level integration. While they do not eliminate Egyptian agency, they structure the conditions under which policy choices are made in a strategically vital regional setting within the U.S.-led order.

Comparative Strategy
Yıldız Technical University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon