Diagnostic Codes for Low Vision and Blindness Incompletely Capture Measured Visual Acuity Impairment in a National EHR Cohort

Purpose To evaluate how well low vision and blindness diagnosis codes identify measured visual acuity impairment and inform their use in observational research. Design Retrospective cross-sectional study. Participants Patients in Epic Cosmos with same-day bilateral non-pinhole distance visual acuity measurements from January 1, 2017, through April 30, 2026. Methods Measured impairment was defined using the worst observed better-seeing-eye distance logMAR visual acuity across all qualifying bilateral measurement dates. Primary measured thresholds were better-seeing-eye visual acuity of 20/40 or worse and 20/200 or worse. Code definitions included any ICD-10-CM H54 code for low vision, blindness, or visual loss, and a restrictive bilateral/legal definition including H54.0*, H54.1*, H54.2*, H54.3*, and H54.8*. Diagnostic performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Sensitivity analyses used alternative VA definitions and evaluated a 20/70 or worse threshold and exclusion of H54.8 from the restrictive definition. Main Outcome Measures Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV. Results The analytic cohort included 13,146,693 patients. Measured better-seeing-eye visual acuity was 20/40 or worse in 3,165,906 patients (24.1%) and 20/200 or worse in 169,588 patients (1.3%). Any H54 code was present in 782,833 patients (6.0%). For visual acuity of 20/40 or worse, any H54 code had sensitivity of 10.5%, specificity of 95.5%, PPV of 42.6%, and NPV of 77.1%. For visual acuity of 20/200 or worse, sensitivity was 30.3%, specificity was 94.4%, PPV was 6.6%, and NPV was 99.0%. The restrictive bilateral/legal H54 definition had lower sensitivity but higher specificity, with sensitivity of 3.3% and 18.7% and specificity of 99.5% and 99.0% for the 20/40 and 20/200 thresholds, respectively. Findings were similar in sensitivity analyses, including analyses using the most recent VA measurement, a 20/70 or worse VA threshold, and a restrictive definition excluding H54.8. Conclusions ICD-coded low vision and blindness identified a selected coded subset of patients with measured visual acuity impairment. Studies using diagnosis codes alone may incompletely ascertain visual impairment, potentially introducing misclassification and bias in observational research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ophthalmology Science
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xops.2026.101454
Primary Topic
Medical Coding and Health Information
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic Codes for Low Vision and Blindness Incompletely Capture Measured Visual Acuity Impairment in a National EHR Cohort

Sasan Moghimi, Robert Neal Weinreb, Takashi Nishida
Ophthalmology Science
Medical Coding and Health Information
article

Diagnostic Codes for Low Vision and Blindness Incompletely Capture Measured Visual Acuity Impairment in a National EHR Cohort

Sasan Moghimi, Robert Neal Weinreb, Takashi Nishida
article en

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate how well low vision and blindness diagnosis codes identify measured visual acuity impairment and inform their use in observational research. Design Retrospective cross-sectional study. Participants Patients in Epic Cosmos with same-day bilateral non-pinhole distance visual acuity measurements from January 1, 2017, through April 30, 2026. Methods Measured impairment was defined using the worst observed better-seeing-eye distance logMAR visual acuity across all qualifying bilateral measurement dates. Primary measured thresholds were better-seeing-eye visual acuity of 20/40 or worse and 20/200 or worse. Code definitions included any ICD-10-CM H54 code for low vision, blindness, or visual loss, and a restrictive bilateral/legal definition including H54.0*, H54.1*, H54.2*, H54.3*, and H54.8*. Diagnostic performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Sensitivity analyses used alternative VA definitions and evaluated a 20/70 or worse threshold and exclusion of H54.8 from the restrictive definition. Main Outcome Measures Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV. Results The analytic cohort included 13,146,693 patients. Measured better-seeing-eye visual acuity was 20/40 or worse in 3,165,906 patients (24.1%) and 20/200 or worse in 169,588 patients (1.3%). Any H54 code was present in 782,833 patients (6.0%). For visual acuity of 20/40 or worse, any H54 code had sensitivity of 10.5%, specificity of 95.5%, PPV of 42.6%, and NPV of 77.1%. For visual acuity of 20/200 or worse, sensitivity was 30.3%, specificity was 94.4%, PPV was 6.6%, and NPV was 99.0%. The restrictive bilateral/legal H54 definition had lower sensitivity but higher specificity, with sensitivity of 3.3% and 18.7% and specificity of 99.5% and 99.0% for the 20/40 and 20/200 thresholds, respectively. Findings were similar in sensitivity analyses, including analyses using the most recent VA measurement, a 20/70 or worse VA threshold, and a restrictive definition excluding H54.8. Conclusions ICD-coded low vision and blindness identified a selected coded subset of patients with measured visual acuity impairment. Studies using diagnosis codes alone may incompletely ascertain visual impairment, potentially introducing misclassification and bias in observational research.

Ophthalmology Science
University of California San Diego (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Medical Coding and Health Information
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon