A Machine Learning Model to Predict Spinal Compression Force During Manual Lifting: Comparison of the Model Performance With Marker-Based Versus Markerless Kinematic Inputs

Musculoskeletal (MSK) modeling is widely used to estimate spinal loading. However, conventional modeling pipelines are computationally intensive and time-consuming, which limit their application for workplace injury risk assessment. This study developed a machine learning (ML) model to predict lumbosacral compression force using intermediate outputs from an MSK modeling workflow. Twenty-one participants completed lifting tasks while marker-based and markerless kinematics were recorded. Reference compression forces were obtained from completed OpenSim simulations, and the resulting dataset was used to train the ML model using three input feature sets. The best-performing model achieved mean root mean square errors of 3.0% with marker-based inputs and 9.9% with markerless inputs. These findings suggest that combining ML with conventional MSK modeling can enable rapid spinal load prediction and may support field deployment when coupled with markerless motion capture. However, given the higher errors observed with markerless input, future work is needed to improve the kinematics accuracy of the markerless system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813261493594
Primary Topic
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Machine Learning Model to Predict Spinal Compression Force During Manual Lifting: Comparison of the Model Performance With Marker-Based Versus Markerless Kinematic Inputs

Jeong Ho Kim, Mina Salehi, Ali Taheri
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
article

A Machine Learning Model to Predict Spinal Compression Force During Manual Lifting: Comparison of the Model Performance With Marker-Based Versus Markerless Kinematic Inputs

Jeong Ho Kim, Mina Salehi, Ali Taheri
article en

Abstract

Musculoskeletal (MSK) modeling is widely used to estimate spinal loading. However, conventional modeling pipelines are computationally intensive and time-consuming, which limit their application for workplace injury risk assessment. This study developed a machine learning (ML) model to predict lumbosacral compression force using intermediate outputs from an MSK modeling workflow. Twenty-one participants completed lifting tasks while marker-based and markerless kinematics were recorded. Reference compression forces were obtained from completed OpenSim simulations, and the resulting dataset was used to train the ML model using three input feature sets. The best-performing model achieved mean root mean square errors of 3.0% with marker-based inputs and 9.9% with markerless inputs. These findings suggest that combining ML with conventional MSK modeling can enable rapid spinal load prediction and may support field deployment when coupled with markerless motion capture. However, given the higher errors observed with markerless input, future work is needed to improve the kinematics accuracy of the markerless system.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Oregon State University (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon