Trust in artificial intelligence and AI-assisted social and civic decision-making among Arab youth: evidence from Egypt, Kuwait, and the UAE

Introduction Trust in artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly shapes how young people evaluate information and public issues, yet evidence from Arab contexts remains limited. This study examined the socio-technical correlates of trust in AI and its association with AI-assisted social and civic decision-making among digitally engaged youth in Egypt, Kuwait, and the United Arab Emirates. Methods A cross-sectional online survey was conducted with 1,023 respondents aged 18–35 recruited through purposive, non-probability sampling. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), structural equation modeling (SEM), multi-group CFA, and competing full- versus partial-mediation models evaluated measurement and structural relationships. Results The partially mediated model fit significantly better than the fully mediated model, Δχ2(5) = 55.66, p < 0.001. Institutional confidence (β = 0.303), AI literacy (β = 0.281), perceived usefulness (β = 0.242), and social influence (β = 0.107) were positively associated with trust in AI, and perceived risk was negatively associated (β = −0.106; all p < 0.001). Trust was positively associated with AI-assisted decision-making (β = 0.412, p < 0.001). Significant indirect associations through trust were observed for all five antecedents, while the direct perceived-risk path to AI-assisted decision-making was nonsignificant. Multi-group CFA supported metric and practical scalar measurement invariance across the three countries. Discussion The findings support a socio-technical account of AI trust in which technological, cognitive, institutional, and social conditions jointly relate to AI-assisted decision-making, with trust functioning as a central but not exclusive pathway. Given the cross-sectional, purposive design, findings are interpreted as associations rather than causal or nationally representative effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Sociology
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2026.1902517
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trust in artificial intelligence and AI-assisted social and civic decision-making among Arab youth: evidence from Egypt, Kuwait, and the UAE

Muna Mohamed Alhammadi, Anwar Alkhurinej, Marzouqah Q. Alazmi, Zezit Mostafa Noufal et al.
4 links
Frontiers in Sociology
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Trust in artificial intelligence and AI-assisted social and civic decision-making among Arab youth: evidence from Egypt, Kuwait, and the UAE

Muna Mohamed Alhammadi, Anwar Alkhurinej, Marzouqah Q. Alazmi, Zezit Mostafa Noufal, Alaa Al-Taii, Kayaty Ashour
article en

Abstract

Introduction Trust in artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly shapes how young people evaluate information and public issues, yet evidence from Arab contexts remains limited. This study examined the socio-technical correlates of trust in AI and its association with AI-assisted social and civic decision-making among digitally engaged youth in Egypt, Kuwait, and the United Arab Emirates. Methods A cross-sectional online survey was conducted with 1,023 respondents aged 18–35 recruited through purposive, non-probability sampling. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), structural equation modeling (SEM), multi-group CFA, and competing full- versus partial-mediation models evaluated measurement and structural relationships. Results The partially mediated model fit significantly better than the fully mediated model, Δχ2(5) = 55.66, p < 0.001. Institutional confidence (β = 0.303), AI literacy (β = 0.281), perceived usefulness (β = 0.242), and social influence (β = 0.107) were positively associated with trust in AI, and perceived risk was negatively associated (β = −0.106; all p < 0.001). Trust was positively associated with AI-assisted decision-making (β = 0.412, p < 0.001). Significant indirect associations through trust were observed for all five antecedents, while the direct perceived-risk path to AI-assisted decision-making was nonsignificant. Multi-group CFA supported metric and practical scalar measurement invariance across the three countries. Discussion The findings support a socio-technical account of AI trust in which technological, cognitive, institutional, and social conditions jointly relate to AI-assisted decision-making, with trust functioning as a central but not exclusive pathway. Given the cross-sectional, purposive design, findings are interpreted as associations rather than causal or nationally representative effects.

Frontiers in SociologyVol. 11
Beni-Suef University (EG), University of Sharjah (AE), Kuwait University (KW), American University in the Emirates (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon