Unilateral Penalty or Mutual Disaster? Assessing the Asymmetric Reduction Effects of Sanctions on Aggregate and Segmented Trade

ABSTRACT Is the impact of sanctions on two‐way trade between sanctioning and sanctioned countries symmetric? This paper compares the differential impact of sanctions on sanctioning and sanctioned countries, with evidence from aggregate trade, segmented trade, and industry‐specific trade. The results show that the impacts of sanctions on both sanctioning and sanctioned countries are negative, widespread, and asymmetric, with a more pronounced negative effect on sanctioned countries. Specifically, for sanctioning countries, sanctions have a more negative impact on trade in intermediate goods and forward participation in the global value chains, as well as on the agriculture, forestry, fishing, mining, and quarrying sectors. Conversely, for sanctioned countries, sanctions have a greater impact on final goods, backward participation in the global value chains, and the manufacturing sectors. By adopting a two‐way perspective and analysing at a segmented trade and industry‐specific level, this paper contributes to the literature on the impact of sanctions on international trade.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Finance & Economics
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.70325
Primary Topic
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unilateral Penalty or Mutual Disaster? Assessing the Asymmetric Reduction Effects of Sanctions on Aggregate and Segmented Trade

Tingting LAN, Hua Zhang, Liuguo Shao
International Journal of Finance & Economics
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
article

Unilateral Penalty or Mutual Disaster? Assessing the Asymmetric Reduction Effects of Sanctions on Aggregate and Segmented Trade

Tingting LAN, Hua Zhang, Liuguo Shao
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Is the impact of sanctions on two‐way trade between sanctioning and sanctioned countries symmetric? This paper compares the differential impact of sanctions on sanctioning and sanctioned countries, with evidence from aggregate trade, segmented trade, and industry‐specific trade. The results show that the impacts of sanctions on both sanctioning and sanctioned countries are negative, widespread, and asymmetric, with a more pronounced negative effect on sanctioned countries. Specifically, for sanctioning countries, sanctions have a more negative impact on trade in intermediate goods and forward participation in the global value chains, as well as on the agriculture, forestry, fishing, mining, and quarrying sectors. Conversely, for sanctioned countries, sanctions have a greater impact on final goods, backward participation in the global value chains, and the manufacturing sectors. By adopting a two‐way perspective and analysing at a segmented trade and industry‐specific level, this paper contributes to the literature on the impact of sanctions on international trade.

International Journal of Finance & Economics
Central South University (CN), Hefei University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon