HA-bortfall hos barn med svenska som L1 och L2

The grammar of Swedish and more or less all of its dialects contain the typologically rare feature auxiliary omission, where forms of the temporal auxiliary ha ‘have’ may be left unexpressed in subordinate clauses. There are reasons to believe that the feature is hard to acquire (e.g. in light of processability theory), but there seem to be no previous studies of L1 or L2 acquisition of Swedish auxiliary omission what so ever. In this article, the first empirical study of its kind is presented on how auxiliary omission is acquired and used among Swedish-speaking children, with an emphasis on children in primary and middle school (roughly between 9 and 13 years of age). Auxiliary omission seems to be especially hard for children taking the school subject Swedish as a second language, as they leave the temporal auxiliary out in main clauses as well. The result might suggest that auxiliary omission belongs to a kind of syntactic patterns that are especially sensitive to age effects, and hence particularly demanding for children with a relatively late age of onset in the acquisition of Swedish.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Språk och stil
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61965/sos.2026.57193
Primary Topic
Language Development and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

HA-bortfall hos barn med svenska som L1 och L2

Adrian Sangfelt
Språk och stil
Language Development and Disorders
article

HA-bortfall hos barn med svenska som L1 och L2

Adrian Sangfelt
article en

Abstract

The grammar of Swedish and more or less all of its dialects contain the typologically rare feature auxiliary omission, where forms of the temporal auxiliary ha ‘have’ may be left unexpressed in subordinate clauses. There are reasons to believe that the feature is hard to acquire (e.g. in light of processability theory), but there seem to be no previous studies of L1 or L2 acquisition of Swedish auxiliary omission what so ever. In this article, the first empirical study of its kind is presented on how auxiliary omission is acquired and used among Swedish-speaking children, with an emphasis on children in primary and middle school (roughly between 9 and 13 years of age). Auxiliary omission seems to be especially hard for children taking the school subject Swedish as a second language, as they leave the temporal auxiliary out in main clauses as well. The result might suggest that auxiliary omission belongs to a kind of syntactic patterns that are especially sensitive to age effects, and hence particularly demanding for children with a relatively late age of onset in the acquisition of Swedish.

Språk och stilVol. 36
Karlstad University (SE)
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Language Development and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon