Development and validation of a controlled aerosol chamber to evaluate air purifiers’ efficiency against live viral aerosols

During the COVID-19 pandemic, air-purifying devices were utilized to clear airborne viral aerosols in multi-occupancy spaces. While these devices are typically tested in confined spaces against various particulate matter, their efficiency in inactivating and removing viral aerosols has yet to be adequately assessed. Several standard methods have been published on this matter. However, this study aims to present an aerosol chamber and a novel method for evaluating the efficacy of air purifiers, specifically against viruses. MS2 bacteriophage was aerosolized inside a 19.32 m³ chamber with controlled air exchange. Viruses were sampled directly onto TSA plates, previously inoculated with MS2’s host strain, using two Slit-to-Agar devices. Particle concentrations were measured using an APS. Air exchange rates were calculated from concentration decay using APS data and culture-based methods, following ASTM-E741 standards. Comparisons were made with and without the air purifier to assess both method validity and purifier efficiency. Five sampling positions were also analyzed to evaluate chamber homogeneity. Other studies have used STA samplers and Impingers to determine the efficiency of portable air cleaners; however, these rely on multiple samplers to obtain time-dependent data. The method described in this paper enables time-dependent decay using 2 STA samplers simultaneously, thereby reducing the number of samples, testing time, and sample processing. Both viral decay and measured air exchange rates were consistent with the use of the air purifier. However, viral decay did not mirror particle decay patterns. Air exchange rates were determined by CO2 (previously) and SF6 monitoring. These differed from particle and viral decays.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aerosol Science and Technology
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2026.2755502
Primary Topic
Infection Control and Ventilation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of a controlled aerosol chamber to evaluate air purifiers’ efficiency against live viral aerosols

Marc Veillette, Gregory Nilsson, Nathalie Turgeon, Vincent Brochu et al.
Aerosol Science and Technology
Infection Control and Ventilation
article

Development and validation of a controlled aerosol chamber to evaluate air purifiers’ efficiency against live viral aerosols

Marc Veillette, Gregory Nilsson, Nathalie Turgeon, Vincent Brochu, Caroline Duchaine, Liang Zhou
article en

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, air-purifying devices were utilized to clear airborne viral aerosols in multi-occupancy spaces. While these devices are typically tested in confined spaces against various particulate matter, their efficiency in inactivating and removing viral aerosols has yet to be adequately assessed. Several standard methods have been published on this matter. However, this study aims to present an aerosol chamber and a novel method for evaluating the efficacy of air purifiers, specifically against viruses. MS2 bacteriophage was aerosolized inside a 19.32 m³ chamber with controlled air exchange. Viruses were sampled directly onto TSA plates, previously inoculated with MS2’s host strain, using two Slit-to-Agar devices. Particle concentrations were measured using an APS. Air exchange rates were calculated from concentration decay using APS data and culture-based methods, following ASTM-E741 standards. Comparisons were made with and without the air purifier to assess both method validity and purifier efficiency. Five sampling positions were also analyzed to evaluate chamber homogeneity. Other studies have used STA samplers and Impingers to determine the efficiency of portable air cleaners; however, these rely on multiple samplers to obtain time-dependent data. The method described in this paper enables time-dependent decay using 2 STA samplers simultaneously, thereby reducing the number of samples, testing time, and sample processing. Both viral decay and measured air exchange rates were consistent with the use of the air purifier. However, viral decay did not mirror particle decay patterns. Air exchange rates were determined by CO2 (previously) and SF6 monitoring. These differed from particle and viral decays.

Aerosol Science and Technology
Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec (CA), National Research Council Canada (CA), Université Laval (CA)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, National Research Council Canada
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Infection Control and Ventilation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon