eDNA-qPCR outperforms larval monitoring for detecting Aedes albopictus under tropical field conditions: associations with larval density and sun exposure

Abstract Mosquito vector surveillance is a major public health priority in tropical regions. Environmental DNA, a promising approach for detecting mosquito larvae in their aquatic breeding sites, remains poorly documented under tropical conditions and must overcome the challenges of DNA degradation and PCR inhibition. This study evaluated a qPCR assay targeting Aedes albopictus eDNA in larval breeding sites, compared its performance with conventional larval surveillance, and identified factors influencing detection and signal intensity. We conducted field validation at 28 breeding sites on La Réunion island over five months, from November 2025 to March 2026, totalling 102 site visits. At each visit, we filtered 120 mL water samples at each breeding site (Sterivex, 0.45 µm) and extracted DNA using a Macherey-Nagel NucleoSpin eDNA Water Kit. We amplified DNA by qPCR using Environmental Master Mix in triplicate, alongside larval surveys. A site was considered eDNA-positive if at least two out of three replicates amplified beyond the detection threshold, established based on a calibration curve. We assessed predictors of detection and signal intensity using mixed models. In the field, eDNA-qPCR detected Ae. albopictus in 64.7% of site visits, significantly more than larval surveys (39.2%, McNemar’s test, X2(1) = 16.45, p < 0.001). Agreement between the two methods was fair (Cohen’s Kappa = 0.30, 95% CI [0.14–0.46]), reflecting their differing temporal sensitivity rather than assay unreliability. Positive and negative percentage agreement were 85% (95% CI: [70.9, 92.9] %) and 48.4% (95% CI: [36.4, 60.6] %), respectively. Larval density was negatively correlated with Ct values (rho=-0.46, p = 0.007), confirming a dose-dependent relationship between larval abundance and eDNA signal. Sun exposure affected eDNA signal intensity, but not detection probability. eDNA-qPCR significantly outperformed larval surveys for detecting Ae. albopictus under tropical field conditions, supporting its use for early detection of invasive vectors and monitoring of vector-control interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11382098/v1
Primary Topic
Mosquito-borne diseases and control
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

eDNA-qPCR outperforms larval monitoring for detecting Aedes albopictus under tropical field conditions: associations with larval density and sun exposure

Inoussa Toé, Jacques Kaboré, Thierry Baldet, Anaïs Etheves et al.
2 links
Research Square
Mosquito-borne diseases and control
preprint

eDNA-qPCR outperforms larval monitoring for detecting Aedes albopictus under tropical field conditions: associations with larval density and sun exposure

Inoussa Toé, Jacques Kaboré, Thierry Baldet, Anaïs Etheves, Abdoulaye Diabaté, David A. Wilkinson, hamidou Maiga, Cyril VOSS, Roch. K. DABIRÉ, Jérémy BOUYER, N’Djodjimmon BEGUEM
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract Mosquito vector surveillance is a major public health priority in tropical regions. Environmental DNA, a promising approach for detecting mosquito larvae in their aquatic breeding sites, remains poorly documented under tropical conditions and must overcome the challenges of DNA degradation and PCR inhibition. This study evaluated a qPCR assay targeting Aedes albopictus eDNA in larval breeding sites, compared its performance with conventional larval surveillance, and identified factors influencing detection and signal intensity. We conducted field validation at 28 breeding sites on La Réunion island over five months, from November 2025 to March 2026, totalling 102 site visits. At each visit, we filtered 120 mL water samples at each breeding site (Sterivex, 0.45 µm) and extracted DNA using a Macherey-Nagel NucleoSpin eDNA Water Kit. We amplified DNA by qPCR using Environmental Master Mix in triplicate, alongside larval surveys. A site was considered eDNA-positive if at least two out of three replicates amplified beyond the detection threshold, established based on a calibration curve. We assessed predictors of detection and signal intensity using mixed models. In the field, eDNA-qPCR detected Ae. albopictus in 64.7% of site visits, significantly more than larval surveys (39.2%, McNemar’s test, X2(1) = 16.45, p < 0.001). Agreement between the two methods was fair (Cohen’s Kappa = 0.30, 95% CI [0.14–0.46]), reflecting their differing temporal sensitivity rather than assay unreliability. Positive and negative percentage agreement were 85% (95% CI: [70.9, 92.9] %) and 48.4% (95% CI: [36.4, 60.6] %), respectively. Larval density was negatively correlated with Ct values (rho=-0.46, p = 0.007), confirming a dose-dependent relationship between larval abundance and eDNA signal. Sun exposure affected eDNA signal intensity, but not detection probability. eDNA-qPCR significantly outperformed larval surveys for detecting Ae. albopictus under tropical field conditions, supporting its use for early detection of invasive vectors and monitoring of vector-control interventions.

Research Square
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (FR), Université de Montpellier (FR), Nazi Boni University (BF), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Animal, Santé, Territoires, Risques et Ecosystèmes (FR), Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (BF)
Clean water and sanitation, Good health and well-being
Mosquito-borne diseases and control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon