From Riyadh to Makkah: The evolution of trilateral security cooperation among Türkiye, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan

Between September 2025 and August 2026, Saudi Arabia, Türkiye, and Pakistan moved from bilateral to trilateral defense commitments, culminating in the Makkah Joint Defense Agreement, which declares an attack on any signatory an attack on all three. Situated within Balance of Threat theory and alliance-politics literature on commitment and abandonment, this article argues that the pact is threat-driven without being threat-convergent. Each signatory aligns against a different primary adversary within a single instrument. The article examines drivers, including eroding confidence in the United States, and assesses the pact’s central ambiguity: whether Pakistan’s nuclear posture extends to its partners, establishing only strategic ambiguity rather than extended deterrence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Comparative Strategy
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01495933.2026.2743087
Primary Topic
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Riyadh to Makkah: The evolution of trilateral security cooperation among Türkiye, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan

Abhishek Yadav
2 links
Comparative Strategy
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
article

From Riyadh to Makkah: The evolution of trilateral security cooperation among Türkiye, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan

Abhishek Yadav
article en

Abstract

Between September 2025 and August 2026, Saudi Arabia, Türkiye, and Pakistan moved from bilateral to trilateral defense commitments, culminating in the Makkah Joint Defense Agreement, which declares an attack on any signatory an attack on all three. Situated within Balance of Threat theory and alliance-politics literature on commitment and abandonment, this article argues that the pact is threat-driven without being threat-convergent. Each signatory aligns against a different primary adversary within a single instrument. The article examines drivers, including eroding confidence in the United States, and assesses the pact’s central ambiguity: whether Pakistan’s nuclear posture extends to its partners, establishing only strategic ambiguity rather than extended deterrence.

Comparative Strategy
Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (IN)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon