INTEGRATION OF GENERATIVE AI SKILLS IN JOB REQUIREMENTS: EVIDENCE FROM JOB ADVERTISEMENTS IN GEORGIA

The rapid diffusion of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools has created a demand for new skills in labour markets. However, research into how employers articulate GenAI competencies in job advertisements has focused almost exclusively on large, technologically advanced economies. This study examines how employers in Georgia, a small upper-middle-income transitional economy, indicate GenAI skill requirements in job advertisements, considering four dimensions: skill visibility, linguistic framing, organisational readiness and skill depth. Deductive content analysis was applied to 94 job advertisements collected in January 2026 from three major Georgian labour market platforms (LinkedIn, Jobs.ge and HR.ge). Each advertisement was coded using a structured 20-indicator codebook derived from established theoretical frameworks. The results show that employers articulate GenAI skills in two ways: by explicitly naming the tool, which is present in 38.3 per cent of advertisements, and by using implicit task language, which is present in 61.7 per cent of advertisements and constitutes the dominant form of signalling. Regardless of occupation or skill depth, employers frame GenAI requirements as mandatory in 81.9 per cent of advertisements, indicating the rapid institutionalisation of GenAI literacy as a baseline labour market expectation. Signals of organisational readiness remain weak: only 21.3 per cent of job advertisements acknowledge any organisational role in enabling AI adoption, while the remaining 78.7 per cent present GenAI competence purely as a prerequisite for candidates. Skill complexity is almost evenly divided between basic and advanced requirements, and occupation strongly predicts this division, creating a clear distinction between a technically advanced group and a large group adopting AI on a more general operational level. Signals of organisational readiness remain weak: only 21.3 per cent of job advertisements acknowledge any organisational role in enabling AI adoption, while the remaining 78.7 per cent present GenAI competence purely as a prerequisite for candidates. Skill complexity is almost evenly divided between basic and advanced requirements, and occupation strongly predicts this division, creating a clear distinction between a technically advanced group and a large group adopting AI on a more general operational level.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Baltic Journal of Economic Studies
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2026-12-5-47-57
Primary Topic
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

INTEGRATION OF GENERATIVE AI SKILLS IN JOB REQUIREMENTS: EVIDENCE FROM JOB ADVERTISEMENTS IN GEORGIA

Tsotne Zhghenti, Natia Khukhunaishvili
3 links
Baltic Journal of Economic Studies
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
article

INTEGRATION OF GENERATIVE AI SKILLS IN JOB REQUIREMENTS: EVIDENCE FROM JOB ADVERTISEMENTS IN GEORGIA

Tsotne Zhghenti, Natia Khukhunaishvili
article en

Abstract

The rapid diffusion of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools has created a demand for new skills in labour markets. However, research into how employers articulate GenAI competencies in job advertisements has focused almost exclusively on large, technologically advanced economies. This study examines how employers in Georgia, a small upper-middle-income transitional economy, indicate GenAI skill requirements in job advertisements, considering four dimensions: skill visibility, linguistic framing, organisational readiness and skill depth. Deductive content analysis was applied to 94 job advertisements collected in January 2026 from three major Georgian labour market platforms (LinkedIn, Jobs.ge and HR.ge). Each advertisement was coded using a structured 20-indicator codebook derived from established theoretical frameworks. The results show that employers articulate GenAI skills in two ways: by explicitly naming the tool, which is present in 38.3 per cent of advertisements, and by using implicit task language, which is present in 61.7 per cent of advertisements and constitutes the dominant form of signalling. Regardless of occupation or skill depth, employers frame GenAI requirements as mandatory in 81.9 per cent of advertisements, indicating the rapid institutionalisation of GenAI literacy as a baseline labour market expectation. Signals of organisational readiness remain weak: only 21.3 per cent of job advertisements acknowledge any organisational role in enabling AI adoption, while the remaining 78.7 per cent present GenAI competence purely as a prerequisite for candidates. Skill complexity is almost evenly divided between basic and advanced requirements, and occupation strongly predicts this division, creating a clear distinction between a technically advanced group and a large group adopting AI on a more general operational level. Signals of organisational readiness remain weak: only 21.3 per cent of job advertisements acknowledge any organisational role in enabling AI adoption, while the remaining 78.7 per cent present GenAI competence purely as a prerequisite for candidates. Skill complexity is almost evenly divided between basic and advanced requirements, and occupation strongly predicts this division, creating a clear distinction between a technically advanced group and a large group adopting AI on a more general operational level.

Baltic Journal of Economic StudiesVol. 12(5)
Business and Technology University (GE)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon