Ritual waste as a misclassified urban waste stream: a critical scoping review of governance gaps and environmental management implications

Ritual waste is often subsumed within generic municipal waste categories despite distinctive material, cultural, and governance characteristics. This critical scoping review examines ritual waste as a potentially misclassified urban waste stream and how its management is shaped by material composition, social meaning, behavioural practices, and institutional arrangements. Following PRISMA-ScR and JBI guidance, searches in Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar/Publish or Perish, supplemented by citation chasing, identified 23 eligible studies. Ritual waste comprised heterogeneous biodegradable and non-biodegradable materials, while handling was influenced by sacredness, social norms, authority, convenience, facility access, and legitimacy. Reported pathways ranged from open dumping, burning, and disposal into water bodiesto segregation, composting, refuse-derived fuel , briquetting, incense production, black soldier fly processing, and bioporesystems. Governance gaps emerged where conventional waste systems failed to accommodate ritual timing, material diversity, and culturally specific handling requirements. Evidence remained geographically concentrated and methodologically heterogeneous. Ritual waste therefore becomes an environmental management challenge through misclassification, as socially significant materials are managed as ordinary waste within systems that insufficiently address symbolic and operational dimensions. Effective management requires culturally legitimate, institutionally adaptive, and coordinated approaches integrating community authority, service design, treatment options, and urban environmental policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geology Ecology and Landscapes
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/24749508.2026.2746128
Primary Topic
Municipal Solid Waste Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ritual waste as a misclassified urban waste stream: a critical scoping review of governance gaps and environmental management implications

Ni Ketut Aryastami, Hari Basuki Notobroto, I Desak Ketut Dewi Satiawati Kurnianingsih
3 links
Geology Ecology and Landscapes
Municipal Solid Waste Management
article

Ritual waste as a misclassified urban waste stream: a critical scoping review of governance gaps and environmental management implications

Ni Ketut Aryastami, Hari Basuki Notobroto, I Desak Ketut Dewi Satiawati Kurnianingsih
article en

Abstract

Ritual waste is often subsumed within generic municipal waste categories despite distinctive material, cultural, and governance characteristics. This critical scoping review examines ritual waste as a potentially misclassified urban waste stream and how its management is shaped by material composition, social meaning, behavioural practices, and institutional arrangements. Following PRISMA-ScR and JBI guidance, searches in Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar/Publish or Perish, supplemented by citation chasing, identified 23 eligible studies. Ritual waste comprised heterogeneous biodegradable and non-biodegradable materials, while handling was influenced by sacredness, social norms, authority, convenience, facility access, and legitimacy. Reported pathways ranged from open dumping, burning, and disposal into water bodiesto segregation, composting, refuse-derived fuel , briquetting, incense production, black soldier fly processing, and bioporesystems. Governance gaps emerged where conventional waste systems failed to accommodate ritual timing, material diversity, and culturally specific handling requirements. Evidence remained geographically concentrated and methodologically heterogeneous. Ritual waste therefore becomes an environmental management challenge through misclassification, as socially significant materials are managed as ordinary waste within systems that insufficiently address symbolic and operational dimensions. Effective management requires culturally legitimate, institutionally adaptive, and coordinated approaches integrating community authority, service design, treatment options, and urban environmental policy.

Geology Ecology and Landscapes
Udayana University (ID), Universitas Airlangga (ID), National Research and Innovation Agency (ID)
Responsible consumption and production, Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Municipal Solid Waste Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon