Case Note on the Supreme Court of Denmark’s Judgment of 18 March 2026 Regarding Legal Standing of Organisations

Abstract This case note discusses the Supreme Court of Denmark’s judgment of 18 March 2026. In this case, four humanitarian organisations brought claims against the Danish National Police and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, seeking to have several permits for the export of military equipment for F-35 fighter jets declared invalid or, alternatively, revoked. The organisations argued that the permits violated Denmark’s international obligations. However, the Supreme Court dismissed the case, ruling that the organisations lacked legal standing. Consequently, the possibilities for humanitarian organisations to bring public interest litigation before Danish courts appear – at least for now – to be rather restricted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nordic Journal of International Law
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15718107-bja10130
Primary Topic
International Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Case Note on the Supreme Court of Denmark’s Judgment of 18 March 2026 Regarding Legal Standing of Organisations

Simon Kærslund Terp
Nordic Journal of International Law
International Law and Human Rights
article

Case Note on the Supreme Court of Denmark’s Judgment of 18 March 2026 Regarding Legal Standing of Organisations

Simon Kærslund Terp
article en

Abstract

Abstract This case note discusses the Supreme Court of Denmark’s judgment of 18 March 2026. In this case, four humanitarian organisations brought claims against the Danish National Police and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, seeking to have several permits for the export of military equipment for F-35 fighter jets declared invalid or, alternatively, revoked. The organisations argued that the permits violated Denmark’s international obligations. However, the Supreme Court dismissed the case, ruling that the organisations lacked legal standing. Consequently, the possibilities for humanitarian organisations to bring public interest litigation before Danish courts appear – at least for now – to be rather restricted.

Nordic Journal of International Law
Aarhus University (DK)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
International Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon