Task-Specific Impacts of Cognitive Fatigue on Subjective Experience and Psychomotor Performance

Objective To determine how cognitive fatigue (CF) affects subjective experience and reaction time (RT) performance across tasks with different processing demands (simple, go/no-go, choice), and whether these effects depend on the type of fatigue-inducing mental work. Background CF is a psychobiological state of subjective exhaustion from mental effort that can compromise workplace productivity and safety. Although slowed RT is an often-observed consequence of CF, it is unclear how this compares across RT paradigms and fatigue-inducing tasks. Method Using a remotely administered experiment, 402 participants completed a 60-minute CF (Math-Memory, Stroop, Time Load Dual-Back) or control (documentary) intervention. Subjective ratings (mental fatigue, motivation) and RT performance (simple, go/no-go, choice) were assessed pre- and post-intervention. Results Relative to control, all CF tasks increased subjective fatigue ( p < .001), while motivation declined following Dual-Back and Stroop ( p ≤ .030) but not Math-Memory. Simple and choice RT slowed significantly following all CF interventions vs control ( p < .010), with the greatest choice RT slowing after Stroop ( p ≤ .032). Only Stroop produced significant go/no-go RT slowing ( p = .004). Conclusion Subjective fatigue and simple RT were broadly sensitive to CF, indicating general psychomotor slowing. Conversely, motivation and higher-complexity RT measures showed task-specific effects, perhaps reflecting overlap between fatigue-inducing and RT task demands. Application Task type is important when considering RT as a fatigue assessment tool. These findings support multidimensional (subjective and RT) CF assessments and indicate that simple RT may be effective for rapid, broad fatigue monitoring, whereas complex RT metrics may be useful when exploring task-specific executive processing effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208261500894
Primary Topic
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Task-Specific Impacts of Cognitive Fatigue on Subjective Experience and Psychomotor Performance

Kathleen J Peters, Anthony N. Carlsen
1 links
Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
article

Task-Specific Impacts of Cognitive Fatigue on Subjective Experience and Psychomotor Performance

Kathleen J Peters, Anthony N. Carlsen
article en

Abstract

Objective To determine how cognitive fatigue (CF) affects subjective experience and reaction time (RT) performance across tasks with different processing demands (simple, go/no-go, choice), and whether these effects depend on the type of fatigue-inducing mental work. Background CF is a psychobiological state of subjective exhaustion from mental effort that can compromise workplace productivity and safety. Although slowed RT is an often-observed consequence of CF, it is unclear how this compares across RT paradigms and fatigue-inducing tasks. Method Using a remotely administered experiment, 402 participants completed a 60-minute CF (Math-Memory, Stroop, Time Load Dual-Back) or control (documentary) intervention. Subjective ratings (mental fatigue, motivation) and RT performance (simple, go/no-go, choice) were assessed pre- and post-intervention. Results Relative to control, all CF tasks increased subjective fatigue ( p < .001), while motivation declined following Dual-Back and Stroop ( p ≤ .030) but not Math-Memory. Simple and choice RT slowed significantly following all CF interventions vs control ( p < .010), with the greatest choice RT slowing after Stroop ( p ≤ .032). Only Stroop produced significant go/no-go RT slowing ( p = .004). Conclusion Subjective fatigue and simple RT were broadly sensitive to CF, indicating general psychomotor slowing. Conversely, motivation and higher-complexity RT measures showed task-specific effects, perhaps reflecting overlap between fatigue-inducing and RT task demands. Application Task type is important when considering RT as a fatigue assessment tool. These findings support multidimensional (subjective and RT) CF assessments and indicate that simple RT may be effective for rapid, broad fatigue monitoring, whereas complex RT metrics may be useful when exploring task-specific executive processing effects.

Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
University of Ottawa (CA)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Task-Specific Impacts of Cognitive Fatigue on Subjective Experience and Psychomotor Performance — Kathleen J Peters, Anthony N. Carlsen · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS