Undergraduate Chemistry Students’ Ability to Evaluate Online Chemistry Claims, Evidence and Soil Management Practices: A Perspective of Scientific Misinformation on Social Media

Scientific misinformation on social media presents a growing challenge for undergraduate Chemistry students, as online claims about chemical processes, fertilisers, soil acidity and soil-management practices may appear credible without adequate scientific evidence. This study examined students’ ability to evaluate online Chemistry claims, supporting evidence and soil-management information, focusing on the relationship between Chemistry knowledge and evaluation ability. A cross-sectional survey design was adopted, involving 250 Nigerian undergraduate students selected through multistage sampling. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire addressing scientific misinformation, online Chemistry claims, evidence and soil-management information. Mean, standard deviation and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used for data analysis at the 0.05 significance level. The findings indicated that students demonstrated a high ability to evaluate online Chemistry claims and evidence (M = 3.30, SD = 0.74). Their ability to evaluate Chemistry-based soil-management information was also high (M = 3.28, SD = 0.55). ANOVA revealed a statistically significant difference in evaluation ability according to Chemistry knowledge level, F(2, 247) = 45.67, p < .001. Students with high Chemistry knowledge achieved the highest evaluation score (M = 3.56, SD = 0.39), followed by those with moderate knowledge (M = 3.21, SD = 0.43) and low knowledge (M = 2.84, SD = 0.48). The study concluded that Chemistry knowledge plays an important role in students’ ability to scrutinise online scientific claims and soil-management information. It recommended that Chemistry departments integrate regular social-media-based evaluation activities into undergraduate courses to strengthen the application of chemical principles, source verification and evidence-based judgement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Federal University Gusau Faculty of Education Journal
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64348/zije.2026669
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Undergraduate Chemistry Students’ Ability to Evaluate Online Chemistry Claims, Evidence and Soil Management Practices: A Perspective of Scientific Misinformation on Social Media

Semiu Olawale Makinde, Lukuman Lekan ADELAKUN, Sheriff Akanbi Kukoyi, Adeoye Oyetunde IGE et al.
Federal University Gusau Faculty of Education Journal
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Undergraduate Chemistry Students’ Ability to Evaluate Online Chemistry Claims, Evidence and Soil Management Practices: A Perspective of Scientific Misinformation on Social Media

Semiu Olawale Makinde, Lukuman Lekan ADELAKUN, Sheriff Akanbi Kukoyi, Adeoye Oyetunde IGE, Tajudeen Abiodun¹ ADELAKUN, Adekunle Solomon OLORUNDARE
article en

Abstract

Scientific misinformation on social media presents a growing challenge for undergraduate Chemistry students, as online claims about chemical processes, fertilisers, soil acidity and soil-management practices may appear credible without adequate scientific evidence. This study examined students’ ability to evaluate online Chemistry claims, supporting evidence and soil-management information, focusing on the relationship between Chemistry knowledge and evaluation ability. A cross-sectional survey design was adopted, involving 250 Nigerian undergraduate students selected through multistage sampling. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire addressing scientific misinformation, online Chemistry claims, evidence and soil-management information. Mean, standard deviation and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used for data analysis at the 0.05 significance level. The findings indicated that students demonstrated a high ability to evaluate online Chemistry claims and evidence (M = 3.30, SD = 0.74). Their ability to evaluate Chemistry-based soil-management information was also high (M = 3.28, SD = 0.55). ANOVA revealed a statistically significant difference in evaluation ability according to Chemistry knowledge level, F(2, 247) = 45.67, p < .001. Students with high Chemistry knowledge achieved the highest evaluation score (M = 3.56, SD = 0.39), followed by those with moderate knowledge (M = 3.21, SD = 0.43) and low knowledge (M = 2.84, SD = 0.48). The study concluded that Chemistry knowledge plays an important role in students’ ability to scrutinise online scientific claims and soil-management information. It recommended that Chemistry departments integrate regular social-media-based evaluation activities into undergraduate courses to strengthen the application of chemical principles, source verification and evidence-based judgement.

Federal University Gusau Faculty of Education JournalVol. 6(6)
Yaba College of Technology (NG)
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon