Post-Revolt Peace

This article sets out to assess Kenya’s preparedness in sustaining peace during the 10 August 2027 General Election. This comes three years after the Generation Z protests against the Finance Bill 2024. It proceeds from the argument that technical preparations are advancing faster than political readiness. The analysis is guided by Galtung’s work on structural violence and positive peace, and Lederach’s theory of conflict transformation. It applies Fairclough’s critical discourse analysis to 18 public texts issued between June 2025 and October 2026 by state officials, electoral and cohesion institutions, opposition leaders, youth activists and media organisations. The analysis shows that officials portray young people as both partners and threats; the label “goons” identifies violence while obscuring those who may organise or finance it; youth mobilisation is increasingly directed towards voter registration; and prevention structures are developing faster than public trust. The article concludes with five practical measures for strengthening electoral peace.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jumuga Journal of Education Oral Studies and Human Sciences (JJEOSHS)
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35544/jjeoshs.v9i2.215
Primary Topic
Peacebuilding and International Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Post-Revolt Peace

Justus K. Musya
3 links
Jumuga Journal of Education Oral Studies and Human Sciences (JJEOSHS)
Peacebuilding and International Security
article

Post-Revolt Peace

Justus K. Musya
article en

Abstract

This article sets out to assess Kenya’s preparedness in sustaining peace during the 10 August 2027 General Election. This comes three years after the Generation Z protests against the Finance Bill 2024. It proceeds from the argument that technical preparations are advancing faster than political readiness. The analysis is guided by Galtung’s work on structural violence and positive peace, and Lederach’s theory of conflict transformation. It applies Fairclough’s critical discourse analysis to 18 public texts issued between June 2025 and October 2026 by state officials, electoral and cohesion institutions, opposition leaders, youth activists and media organisations. The analysis shows that officials portray young people as both partners and threats; the label “goons” identifies violence while obscuring those who may organise or finance it; youth mobilisation is increasingly directed towards voter registration; and prevention structures are developing faster than public trust. The article concludes with five practical measures for strengthening electoral peace.

Jumuga Journal of Education Oral Studies and Human Sciences (JJEOSHS)Vol. 9(2)
Daystar University (KE)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Peacebuilding and International Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Post-Revolt Peace — Justus K. Musya · Jumuga Journal of Education Oral Studies and Human Sciences (JJEOSHS) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS