Clinical validation of Node-RADS for nodal staging in colon cancer: a retrospective study of 360 patients

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the Node Reporting and Data System version 1.0 (Node-RADS 1.0) for preoperative evaluation of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in colon cancer and to benchmark its diagnostic performance against conventional CT-based size criteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled patients who underwent radical resection for colon cancer at Shantou Central Hospital between January 2015 and January 2019. All patients received radical resection followed by histopathological evaluation of regional lymph nodes. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) images were independently reviewed by two experienced radiologists using the Node-RADS scoring system. Inter-observer agreement was assessed, and diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: A total of 360 patients were included. Lymph node positivity was associated with several CT features, including nodal size, internal heterogeneity, necrosis, margin characteristics, fatty hilum status, and the Node-RADS score (all p < 0.05). The Node-RADS score demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.835, 95% CI: 0.792-0.871) with an optimal cutoff of ≥3, good inter-observer reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.962), and higher discriminative ability than the conventional 10-mm size criterion (AUC 0.546; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In this large retrospective cohort, contrast-enhanced CT-based Node-RADS demonstrated reliable diagnostic performance for preoperative assessment of LNM in colon cancer and outperformed the conventional size-based criterion. The good inter-observer agreement further supports the reproducibility and clinical feasibility of Node-RADS in routine clinical practice. KEY POINTS: Question Can CT-based Node-RADS overcome the low sensitivity and underestimation of nodal metastasis associated with the conventional 10-mm short-axis criterion in preoperative colon cancer staging? Findings In 360 patients, Node-RADS at ≥3 achieved an AUC of 0.835, 96.6% sensitivity, and good interobserver agreement, outperforming the 10-mm criterion with fewer missed metastases. Critical relevance statement In 360 patients, Node-RADS at ≥3 achieved an AUC of 0.835, 96.6% sensitivity, and good interobserver agreement, outperforming the 10-mm criterion with fewer missed metastases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Insights into Imaging
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-026-02441-y
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical validation of Node-RADS for nodal staging in colon cancer: a retrospective study of 360 patients

Honghui Lian, Zhuangyong Xu, Jianning Xiao, Danfeng Wang et al.
5 links
Insights into Imaging
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
article

Clinical validation of Node-RADS for nodal staging in colon cancer: a retrospective study of 360 patients

Honghui Lian, Zhuangyong Xu, Jianning Xiao, Danfeng Wang, Guo Wu, Daiying Lin, Kailun Lin, Han Li, Yulian Xie, Yukai Chen
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the Node Reporting and Data System version 1.0 (Node-RADS 1.0) for preoperative evaluation of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in colon cancer and to benchmark its diagnostic performance against conventional CT-based size criteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled patients who underwent radical resection for colon cancer at Shantou Central Hospital between January 2015 and January 2019. All patients received radical resection followed by histopathological evaluation of regional lymph nodes. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) images were independently reviewed by two experienced radiologists using the Node-RADS scoring system. Inter-observer agreement was assessed, and diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: A total of 360 patients were included. Lymph node positivity was associated with several CT features, including nodal size, internal heterogeneity, necrosis, margin characteristics, fatty hilum status, and the Node-RADS score (all p < 0.05). The Node-RADS score demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.835, 95% CI: 0.792-0.871) with an optimal cutoff of ≥3, good inter-observer reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.962), and higher discriminative ability than the conventional 10-mm size criterion (AUC 0.546; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In this large retrospective cohort, contrast-enhanced CT-based Node-RADS demonstrated reliable diagnostic performance for preoperative assessment of LNM in colon cancer and outperformed the conventional size-based criterion. The good inter-observer agreement further supports the reproducibility and clinical feasibility of Node-RADS in routine clinical practice. KEY POINTS: Question Can CT-based Node-RADS overcome the low sensitivity and underestimation of nodal metastasis associated with the conventional 10-mm short-axis criterion in preoperative colon cancer staging? Findings In 360 patients, Node-RADS at ≥3 achieved an AUC of 0.835, 96.6% sensitivity, and good interobserver agreement, outperforming the 10-mm criterion with fewer missed metastases. Critical relevance statement In 360 patients, Node-RADS at ≥3 achieved an AUC of 0.835, 96.6% sensitivity, and good interobserver agreement, outperforming the 10-mm criterion with fewer missed metastases.

Insights into ImagingVol. 17(1)
Shantou Central Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon