Comparative analysis of social capital during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Russia and Japan

This paper examines the features and roles of social capital in Russia and Japan from a comparative economic perspective during the COVID-19 pandemic. Drawing on original survey data, it investigates patterns of interpersonal trust, institutional trust, civic engagement, resource mobilisation from existing social networks, and evaluations of government policies. Despite shared characteristics of strong particularised trust and limited generalised trust, the findings reveal distinct configurations of social capital. Russia exhibits bonding-centred social capital, characterised by reliance on family and close personal networks and concentrated trust in selected state institutions. Japan combines both bonding and bridging social capital, although traditional local community ties, civic engagement, and institutional trust have weakened. During the pandemic, informal networks provided support in Russia, whereas formal institutional assistance was perceived as relatively more effective in Japan. Differences in policy evaluations across age groups further suggest an ongoing transformation of social capital in both countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asia and the Global Economy
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aglobe.2026.100151
Primary Topic
Social Capital and Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of social capital during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Russia and Japan

Hiroaki Hayashi, Satoshi Mizobata, Victor Gorshkov, Kazuho Yokogawa
Asia and the Global Economy
Social Capital and Networks
article

Comparative analysis of social capital during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Russia and Japan

Hiroaki Hayashi, Satoshi Mizobata, Victor Gorshkov, Kazuho Yokogawa
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the features and roles of social capital in Russia and Japan from a comparative economic perspective during the COVID-19 pandemic. Drawing on original survey data, it investigates patterns of interpersonal trust, institutional trust, civic engagement, resource mobilisation from existing social networks, and evaluations of government policies. Despite shared characteristics of strong particularised trust and limited generalised trust, the findings reveal distinct configurations of social capital. Russia exhibits bonding-centred social capital, characterised by reliance on family and close personal networks and concentrated trust in selected state institutions. Japan combines both bonding and bridging social capital, although traditional local community ties, civic engagement, and institutional trust have weakened. During the pandemic, informal networks provided support in Russia, whereas formal institutional assistance was perceived as relatively more effective in Japan. Differences in policy evaluations across age groups further suggest an ongoing transformation of social capital in both countries.

Asia and the Global EconomyVol. 6(2)
University of Niigata Prefecture (JP), Ritsumeikan University (JP), Kanagawa University (JP), Kyoto Institute of Economic Research, Kyoto University (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science London
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Social Capital and Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Comparative analysis of social capital during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Russia and Japan — Hiroaki Hayashi, Satoshi Mizobata, et al. · Asia and the Global Economy (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS