Local Therapy of Metastases in Colorectal Cancer: Utilization and Survival in a Nationwide Population

PURPOSE: Local therapy (LT) for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is recommended when eradicating all metastases is feasible. Although LT is widely used, its population-level impact remains unclear. This study aims to use real-world population-based data to assess LT utilization and survival trends in mCRC. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with mCRC from 2010 to 2023 were included, using data from the Cancer Registry of Norway and the Norwegian Patient Registry. LT was defined as surgery, stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), or ablation targeting liver, lung, or brain metastases. Outcomes were reported as median overall survival (OS) and 2-, 5-, and 10-year OS. The effect of the first versus last time period on survival was assessed using univariable and multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: Among 64,112 CRC cases, 20,210 had mCRC. Of these, 21% received LT, 39% systemic therapy only, 12% other therapies, and 29% no therapy. Metastasectomy was the primary LT (87%), whereas SRT use was limited. LT use increased by 12% annually from 2010 to 2015 and then stabilized. The overall mCRC survival improved, with the 5-year OS increasing from 16% to 23% and the median OS from 15 to 18 months (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.89 to 0.95). No significant survival improvement was observed between time periods in the LT or systemic therapy only subgroups. The 5-year OS for patients receiving LT for liver, lung, and brain metastases was 50%, 62%, and 5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: LT utilization increased, with outcomes comparable with more selected populations. Survival in treatment subgroups remained stable over time, but improved in the overall mCRC population, suggesting that the population-level gains may reflect changes in treatment allocation rather than improvements within modalities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op-26-00381
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Local Therapy of Metastases in Colorectal Cancer: Utilization and Survival in a Nationwide Population

Marianne G. Guren, Jørgen Smeby, Halfdan Sørbye, Kristoffer Lassen et al.
1 links
JCO Oncology Practice
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
article

Local Therapy of Metastases in Colorectal Cancer: Utilization and Survival in a Nationwide Population

Marianne G. Guren, Jørgen Smeby, Halfdan Sørbye, Kristoffer Lassen, Julian Hamfjord, Inger Kristin Larsen, M.F. Ystgaard, Tor Åge Myklebust
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Local therapy (LT) for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is recommended when eradicating all metastases is feasible. Although LT is widely used, its population-level impact remains unclear. This study aims to use real-world population-based data to assess LT utilization and survival trends in mCRC. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with mCRC from 2010 to 2023 were included, using data from the Cancer Registry of Norway and the Norwegian Patient Registry. LT was defined as surgery, stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), or ablation targeting liver, lung, or brain metastases. Outcomes were reported as median overall survival (OS) and 2-, 5-, and 10-year OS. The effect of the first versus last time period on survival was assessed using univariable and multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: Among 64,112 CRC cases, 20,210 had mCRC. Of these, 21% received LT, 39% systemic therapy only, 12% other therapies, and 29% no therapy. Metastasectomy was the primary LT (87%), whereas SRT use was limited. LT use increased by 12% annually from 2010 to 2015 and then stabilized. The overall mCRC survival improved, with the 5-year OS increasing from 16% to 23% and the median OS from 15 to 18 months (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.89 to 0.95). No significant survival improvement was observed between time periods in the LT or systemic therapy only subgroups. The 5-year OS for patients receiving LT for liver, lung, and brain metastases was 50%, 62%, and 5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: LT utilization increased, with outcomes comparable with more selected populations. Survival in treatment subgroups remained stable over time, but improved in the overall mCRC population, suggesting that the population-level gains may reflect changes in treatment allocation rather than improvements within modalities.

JCO Oncology Practice
Oslo University Hospital (NO), Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO), University of Oslo (NO), Haukeland University Hospital (NO), Ålesund Hospital (NO), Lovisenberg Diakonale Høgskole (NO), Cancer Registry of Norway (NO), University of Bergen (NO), UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon