Comparison of activated versus nonactivated irrigation on bacterial load reduction and postoperative pain: A randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background: For effective disinfection of the root canal system, irrigant activation enhances antimicrobial efficacy and reduces postoperative pain. Aim: To compare activated and nonactivated irrigation techniques in reducing bacterial load and postoperative pain in single-rooted teeth with pulpal necrosis. Materials and Methods: Fifty-four patients aged 18–55 years, single-rooted necrotic teeth were randomly allocated into three groups ( n = 18) based upon different irrigation techniques: Group A–side-vented needle, Group B–passive ultrasonic, and Group C–air-sonic. The irrigation protocol followed for all groups was 2.5%sodium hypochlorite, 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, and 2% chlorhexidine. Before collection of the sample, 0.3% L-lecithin and 3% Tween-80 were used as irrigant neutralizers. Sampling: (S1) before access opening, (S2) after access opening, before cleaning and shaping, (S3) after cleaning and shaping. Sample collection by sterile paper points and inoculated onto agar plates; the colony-forming units (CFU) were quantified using a colony counter. Postoperative pain was recorded by patient marking on the provided VAS chart at baseline, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h. Data analyzation by one-way analysis of variance, Chi-square test, and Bonferroni post hoc analysis. Results: At S1, the mean CFU score was 0.00 in all groups; at S2, 1.00 across all groups. After irrigation (S3), mean CFU scores were 0.53 in Group A, 0.12 in Group B, and 0.31 in Group C, with a statistically significant difference ( P = 0.041). Postoperative mean pain scores at 6, 12, and 24 h were 2.944, 2.111, and 0.778 in Group A; 2.500, 1.556, and 0.278, in Group B; and 2.889, 1.867, and 0.433 in Group C. Statistically significant differences were observed at 12, 24, and 48 h ( P = 0.001). Conclusion: Passive ultrasonic irrigation was the most effective technique due to superior irrigant activation at higher acoustic streaming and cavitation, assuring biofilm disruption, reducing bacterial load, and reducing postoperative pain score.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/jcde.jcde_333_26
Primary Topic
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of activated versus nonactivated irrigation on bacterial load reduction and postoperative pain: A randomized controlled trial

Ekadashi Rajni, Charu Thanvi, Deepak Raisingani, Ashwini B Prasad et al.
Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
article

Comparison of activated versus nonactivated irrigation on bacterial load reduction and postoperative pain: A randomized controlled trial

Ekadashi Rajni, Charu Thanvi, Deepak Raisingani, Ashwini B Prasad, Harshit Srivastava, M. Venkat Ramana Reddy
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: For effective disinfection of the root canal system, irrigant activation enhances antimicrobial efficacy and reduces postoperative pain. Aim: To compare activated and nonactivated irrigation techniques in reducing bacterial load and postoperative pain in single-rooted teeth with pulpal necrosis. Materials and Methods: Fifty-four patients aged 18–55 years, single-rooted necrotic teeth were randomly allocated into three groups ( n = 18) based upon different irrigation techniques: Group A–side-vented needle, Group B–passive ultrasonic, and Group C–air-sonic. The irrigation protocol followed for all groups was 2.5%sodium hypochlorite, 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, and 2% chlorhexidine. Before collection of the sample, 0.3% L-lecithin and 3% Tween-80 were used as irrigant neutralizers. Sampling: (S1) before access opening, (S2) after access opening, before cleaning and shaping, (S3) after cleaning and shaping. Sample collection by sterile paper points and inoculated onto agar plates; the colony-forming units (CFU) were quantified using a colony counter. Postoperative pain was recorded by patient marking on the provided VAS chart at baseline, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h. Data analyzation by one-way analysis of variance, Chi-square test, and Bonferroni post hoc analysis. Results: At S1, the mean CFU score was 0.00 in all groups; at S2, 1.00 across all groups. After irrigation (S3), mean CFU scores were 0.53 in Group A, 0.12 in Group B, and 0.31 in Group C, with a statistically significant difference ( P = 0.041). Postoperative mean pain scores at 6, 12, and 24 h were 2.944, 2.111, and 0.778 in Group A; 2.500, 1.556, and 0.278, in Group B; and 2.889, 1.867, and 0.433 in Group C. Statistically significant differences were observed at 12, 24, and 48 h ( P = 0.001). Conclusion: Passive ultrasonic irrigation was the most effective technique due to superior irrigant activation at higher acoustic streaming and cavitation, assuring biofilm disruption, reducing bacterial load, and reducing postoperative pain score.

Journal of Conservative Dentistry and EndodonticsVol. 29(11)
Mahatma Gandhi Dental College & Hospital (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon