Publishing the History of Radical Science in a Time of Digital Capitalism

This paper investigates publishing as a practice in the history of science. It firstly provides an experiential account of building a DIY-inspired publishing venue for collective, source-based narration. The venue used the possibilities of digital publishing to apply, rather than simply refer to, a very striking aspect of radical science in the 1970s and 1980s: its media techniques. Secondly, the paper shows how source material itself is now embedded in digital capitalism by way of digital rights licensing agencies. Critiques of digitalization in academic publishing have primarily and importantly focused on the adoption of Open Access as a profitable business model by publishing conglomerates selling access and aggregating user data. But conglomerates also capitalize on historical material created by other, bygone publishers by assetizing their backlists. Furthermore, these backlists are now part of a new ownership regime. The paper brings these experiential and infrastructural inquiries together as a way to explore processes of digitalization in humanities publishing, concluding that the manner in which publishing is organized has not only financial consequences for scholarship, but epistemic ones.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bewi.70045
Primary Topic
Publishing and Scholarly Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Publishing the History of Radical Science in a Time of Digital Capitalism

Niki Rhyner
Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte
Publishing and Scholarly Communication
article

Publishing the History of Radical Science in a Time of Digital Capitalism

Niki Rhyner
article en

Abstract

This paper investigates publishing as a practice in the history of science. It firstly provides an experiential account of building a DIY-inspired publishing venue for collective, source-based narration. The venue used the possibilities of digital publishing to apply, rather than simply refer to, a very striking aspect of radical science in the 1970s and 1980s: its media techniques. Secondly, the paper shows how source material itself is now embedded in digital capitalism by way of digital rights licensing agencies. Critiques of digitalization in academic publishing have primarily and importantly focused on the adoption of Open Access as a profitable business model by publishing conglomerates selling access and aggregating user data. But conglomerates also capitalize on historical material created by other, bygone publishers by assetizing their backlists. Furthermore, these backlists are now part of a new ownership regime. The paper brings these experiential and infrastructural inquiries together as a way to explore processes of digitalization in humanities publishing, concluding that the manner in which publishing is organized has not only financial consequences for scholarship, but epistemic ones.

Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Publishing and Scholarly Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon