Urban digital twins and digital twinning as a continuing planning practice

Urban digital twins are increasingly used to support planning, policy, and urban governance, yet cities cannot be fully captured as stable digital representations. Building on existing understandings of digital twinning, this article argues for conceptualizing urban digital twinning as a continuing institutional planning practice. We distinguish the digital twin as a configured representational and analytical system from digital twinning as the broader practice connecting digital representation with interpretation, deliberation, governance, planning decisions, urban interventions, monitoring, institutional learning, and model revision across successive planning cycles. This perspective emphasizes the role of human judgment and institutional knowledge in responding to evolving urban conditions and planning uncertainty, offering a basis for more adaptive, transparent, accountable, and context-sensitive urban planning and governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Sustainable Cities
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2026.2011125
Primary Topic
Smart Cities and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Urban digital twins and digital twinning as a continuing planning practice

Michael Batty, Abdulaziz I. Almulhim
7 links
Frontiers in Sustainable Cities
Smart Cities and Technologies
article

Urban digital twins and digital twinning as a continuing planning practice

Michael Batty, Abdulaziz I. Almulhim
article en

Abstract

Urban digital twins are increasingly used to support planning, policy, and urban governance, yet cities cannot be fully captured as stable digital representations. Building on existing understandings of digital twinning, this article argues for conceptualizing urban digital twinning as a continuing institutional planning practice. We distinguish the digital twin as a configured representational and analytical system from digital twinning as the broader practice connecting digital representation with interpretation, deliberation, governance, planning decisions, urban interventions, monitoring, institutional learning, and model revision across successive planning cycles. This perspective emphasizes the role of human judgment and institutional knowledge in responding to evolving urban conditions and planning uncertainty, offering a basis for more adaptive, transparent, accountable, and context-sensitive urban planning and governance.

Frontiers in Sustainable CitiesVol. 8
University College London (GB), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (SA)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Smart Cities and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Urban digital twins and digital twinning as a continuing planning practice — Michael Batty, Abdulaziz I. Almulhim · Frontiers in Sustainable Cities (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS