Front-of-package ultraprocessed warning labels: a randomized controlled trial with Chilean parents

Background Interest in ultraprocessed food (UPF) front-of-package labels (FOPLs) has been gaining momentum, but questions remain about their added value in the context of established nutrient-based FOPL systems. This study examined the impact of adding a UPF label to Chile's existing nutrient FOPLs on Chilean parents' product perceptions and behavioral intentions. Methods In 2025, Chilean parents (analytical sample n = 3,519) were randomly assigned to either a control condition (nutrient labels only) or a UPF label condition (nutrient labels plus UPF label). Participants viewed three similar products (all potato chips with the same flavor, all UPFs, one not high in any nutrients of concern, one high in one nutrient, and one high in two nutrients), indicated whether they believed each product to be ultraprocessed, and rated their product purchase intentions and perceived product healthfulness. Average differential effects (ADEs) are reported in percentage points (pp) or 1–5 scales. Results Compared to control, the addition of the UPF label improved participants' ability to correctly identify products as ultraprocessed, but effect sizes decreased as the number of nutrient labels increased (ADE = 12pp for product not high in nutrients of concern, ADE = 4pp for product high in one nutrient, both p < 0.001; p > 0.05 for product high in two nutrients). The addition of the UPF label also led to lower purchase intentions and perceived healthfulness for all three products, but effect sizes again decreased as the number of nutrient labels increased (purchase intentions: ADE = 0.32 for product not high in nutrients of concern, ADE = 0.23 for product high in one nutrient, ADE = 0.20 for product high in two nutrients; perceived healthfulness: ADE = 0.33 for product not high in nutrients of concern, ADE = 0.17 for product high in one nutrient, ADE = 0.11 for product high in two nutrients; all p < 0.001). Conclusions Overall, the addition of UPF labels to existing FOPL systems may help consumers more easily identify products as ultraprocessed and lower consumers' perceived healthfulness and purchase intentions of UPFs. UPF labels could have the largest effects when applied to UPFs that carry no or few nutrient labels. Registration https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06842680 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Nutrition
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2026.1973978
Primary Topic
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Front-of-package ultraprocessed warning labels: a randomized controlled trial with Chilean parents

Natalia Rebolledo, Shu Wen Ng, Marissa G. Hall, Aline D’Angelo Campos et al.
2 links
Frontiers in Nutrition
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
article

Front-of-package ultraprocessed warning labels: a randomized controlled trial with Chilean parents

Natalia Rebolledo, Shu Wen Ng, Marissa G. Hall, Aline D’Angelo Campos, Lindsey Smith Taillie
article en

Abstract

Background Interest in ultraprocessed food (UPF) front-of-package labels (FOPLs) has been gaining momentum, but questions remain about their added value in the context of established nutrient-based FOPL systems. This study examined the impact of adding a UPF label to Chile's existing nutrient FOPLs on Chilean parents' product perceptions and behavioral intentions. Methods In 2025, Chilean parents (analytical sample n = 3,519) were randomly assigned to either a control condition (nutrient labels only) or a UPF label condition (nutrient labels plus UPF label). Participants viewed three similar products (all potato chips with the same flavor, all UPFs, one not high in any nutrients of concern, one high in one nutrient, and one high in two nutrients), indicated whether they believed each product to be ultraprocessed, and rated their product purchase intentions and perceived product healthfulness. Average differential effects (ADEs) are reported in percentage points (pp) or 1–5 scales. Results Compared to control, the addition of the UPF label improved participants' ability to correctly identify products as ultraprocessed, but effect sizes decreased as the number of nutrient labels increased (ADE = 12pp for product not high in nutrients of concern, ADE = 4pp for product high in one nutrient, both p < 0.001; p > 0.05 for product high in two nutrients). The addition of the UPF label also led to lower purchase intentions and perceived healthfulness for all three products, but effect sizes again decreased as the number of nutrient labels increased (purchase intentions: ADE = 0.32 for product not high in nutrients of concern, ADE = 0.23 for product high in one nutrient, ADE = 0.20 for product high in two nutrients; perceived healthfulness: ADE = 0.33 for product not high in nutrients of concern, ADE = 0.17 for product high in one nutrient, ADE = 0.11 for product high in two nutrients; all p < 0.001). Conclusions Overall, the addition of UPF labels to existing FOPL systems may help consumers more easily identify products as ultraprocessed and lower consumers' perceived healthfulness and purchase intentions of UPFs. UPF labels could have the largest effects when applied to UPFs that carry no or few nutrient labels. Registration https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06842680 .

Frontiers in NutritionVol. 13
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
Bloomberg Philanthropies
Zero hunger, Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon