Evaluation of Retentive Force of Maxillary Complete Dentures with a Gel-Type Denture Adhesive: A Pilot Randomized Crossover Trial

Background/Objectives: A gel-type denture adhesive developed for patients with dry mouth has been shown to increase the retentive force of experimental palatal plates; however, its effect on complete dentures in the oral cavity is unknown. This study compared changes over time in the retentive force of maxillary complete dentures between this adhesive and a conventional cream-type adhesive. Methods: In this pilot randomized crossover trial (jRCT1032240582), 21 maxillary complete denture wearers (11 men and 10 women; mean age, 81.1 years) received a gel-type adhesive for dry mouth (PK) and a conventional cream-type adhesive (NP) in random order on two days 7 days apart. The retentive force of a 3D-printed duplicate denture was measured at 0 min and every 10 min up to 30 min after application, and usability was rated on a visual analogue scale (VAS). Data were analyzed using a linear mixed model with Bonferroni adjustment. Results: A significant treatment × time interaction was observed (p < 0.001). PK showed a significantly higher retentive force than NP at 0 min (difference, 2.37 N; 95% CI, 1.86–2.88) and 10 min (1.00 N; 0.49–1.51). At 30 min, NP showed a higher retentive force than PK (0.63 N; 0.12–1.14), but the difference was not significant after Bonferroni adjustment (p = 0.069); no significant difference was observed at 20 min. PK was rated as less sticky, more moistening, and easier to wash off than NP (p ≤ 0.004). No adverse events occurred. Conclusions: The two adhesives showed different time-dependent patterns of retention: PK provided higher retention immediately after application, whereas the retention of NP increased over time; PK was also rated more favorably for usability. Because most participants did not have clinically defined dry mouth, these preliminary findings are not sufficient to support clinical recommendations, and further studies in patients with dry mouth and over longer periods are needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oral
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/oral6060143
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Retentive Force of Maxillary Complete Dentures with a Gel-Type Denture Adhesive: A Pilot Randomized Crossover Trial

Kunihito Yamane, Tomoko Mukai, Mana Hirayama, Junichi Furuya et al.
Oral
Dental materials and restorations
article

Evaluation of Retentive Force of Maxillary Complete Dentures with a Gel-Type Denture Adhesive: A Pilot Randomized Crossover Trial

Kunihito Yamane, Tomoko Mukai, Mana Hirayama, Junichi Furuya, Osamu Shimodaira, Ryo Sugiki
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: A gel-type denture adhesive developed for patients with dry mouth has been shown to increase the retentive force of experimental palatal plates; however, its effect on complete dentures in the oral cavity is unknown. This study compared changes over time in the retentive force of maxillary complete dentures between this adhesive and a conventional cream-type adhesive. Methods: In this pilot randomized crossover trial (jRCT1032240582), 21 maxillary complete denture wearers (11 men and 10 women; mean age, 81.1 years) received a gel-type adhesive for dry mouth (PK) and a conventional cream-type adhesive (NP) in random order on two days 7 days apart. The retentive force of a 3D-printed duplicate denture was measured at 0 min and every 10 min up to 30 min after application, and usability was rated on a visual analogue scale (VAS). Data were analyzed using a linear mixed model with Bonferroni adjustment. Results: A significant treatment × time interaction was observed (p < 0.001). PK showed a significantly higher retentive force than NP at 0 min (difference, 2.37 N; 95% CI, 1.86–2.88) and 10 min (1.00 N; 0.49–1.51). At 30 min, NP showed a higher retentive force than PK (0.63 N; 0.12–1.14), but the difference was not significant after Bonferroni adjustment (p = 0.069); no significant difference was observed at 20 min. PK was rated as less sticky, more moistening, and easier to wash off than NP (p ≤ 0.004). No adverse events occurred. Conclusions: The two adhesives showed different time-dependent patterns of retention: PK provided higher retention immediately after application, whereas the retention of NP increased over time; PK was also rated more favorably for usability. Because most participants did not have clinically defined dry mouth, these preliminary findings are not sufficient to support clinical recommendations, and further studies in patients with dry mouth and over longer periods are needed.

OralVol. 6(6)
SHOWA Medical University (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon