Governance, Decentralization, and Fertility Policy: Lessons from Sweden for South Korea

Abstract South Korea faces a severe demographic crisis with a total fertility rate (TFR) of 0.72 in 2023. Despite massive financial investments, low fertility persists. While existing literature focuses on socioeconomic factors like housing and education costs, this paper examines the political dimension. Drawing on Sweden’s trajectory of low birth rates and welfare state evolution, this study explores how governance structures shape population policy outcomes. Through comparative institutional analysis, we argue that South Korea’s hyper-centralized political system intensifies spatial and socioeconomic concentration in the capital region, exacerbating regional inequality and demographic decline. Institutional decentralization, as illustrated by Sweden, provides a framework for regionally tailored and socially sustainable family policies. Keywords: Fertility decline; Political centralization; Decentralization; Regional inequality; South Korea; Sweden

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23854086
Primary Topic
Social Policies and Family
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Governance, Decentralization, and Fertility Policy: Lessons from Sweden for South Korea

Jeonghwan Lee
2 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Social Policies and Family
preprint

Governance, Decentralization, and Fertility Policy: Lessons from Sweden for South Korea

Jeonghwan Lee
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract South Korea faces a severe demographic crisis with a total fertility rate (TFR) of 0.72 in 2023. Despite massive financial investments, low fertility persists. While existing literature focuses on socioeconomic factors like housing and education costs, this paper examines the political dimension. Drawing on Sweden’s trajectory of low birth rates and welfare state evolution, this study explores how governance structures shape population policy outcomes. Through comparative institutional analysis, we argue that South Korea’s hyper-centralized political system intensifies spatial and socioeconomic concentration in the capital region, exacerbating regional inequality and demographic decline. Institutional decentralization, as illustrated by Sweden, provides a framework for regionally tailored and socially sustainable family policies. Keywords: Fertility decline; Political centralization; Decentralization; Regional inequality; South Korea; Sweden

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
Reduced inequalities, Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Social Policies and Family
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Governance, Decentralization, and Fertility Policy: Lessons from Sweden for South Korea — Jeonghwan Lee · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS