Residual Shunt at 6 Months Follow‐up After Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure in CAHAL: A Comparison of Occlutech and Amplatzer

BACKGROUND: Residual shunt is a known complication in percutaneous patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure, and moderate to large residual shunt has been associated with an increased risk of recurrent stroke. Device-related factors, such as device size, have been associated with residual shunt, but comparative data per device type are scarce. AIMS: We compared the prevalence of moderate to large residual shunt at 6 months between the Amplatzer and Occlutech devices. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, patients undergoing successful percutaneous PFO closure with an Amplatzer or Occlutech dedicated closure device within the CAHAL centers Amsterdam UMC and Leiden UMC between 2018 and 2024 were included. The study population was divided into patients treated with an Occlutech and an Amplatzer device. The prevalence of moderate/large residual shunt at 6 months of follow-up was compared between the two groups. As a sensitivity analysis, a logistic regression was conducted to determine the association between the treatment groups and moderate/large residual shunt. The logistic regression was conducted in a weighted population using inverse probability weighting (IPTW), correcting for age, sex, smoking status, shunt size at baseline, device size, and atrial septal aneurysm. RESULTS: A total of 413 patients were included with an average age of 45.8 ± 11.3 years and 51.6% were male. Of the included patients, 279 were treated with an Amplatzer- and 134 with an Occlutech device. In the group treated with an Amplatzer, 22.2% of the patients had a moderate or large residual shunt at 6 months compared to 14.9% in the Occlutech group (p = 0.11). The sensitivity analysis did not show an association between device type and moderate/large shunt OR 0.71 (95% CI: 0.39-1.28, p = 0.25). CONCLUSION: In this study, no significant difference was observed in moderate/large residual shunt prevalence at 6 months of follow-up between the Occlutech and Amplatzer devices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70963
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Residual Shunt at 6 Months Follow‐up After Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure in CAHAL: A Comparison of Occlutech and Amplatzer

Jonathan M. Coutinho, Berto Jorrit Bouma, Maik J. Grundeken, Lars S. Witte et al.
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Cardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications
article

Residual Shunt at 6 Months Follow‐up After Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure in CAHAL: A Comparison of Occlutech and Amplatzer

Jonathan M. Coutinho, Berto Jorrit Bouma, Maik J. Grundeken, Lars S. Witte, Abdelhak El Bouziani, Robbert J. de Winter, Bart Straver, Frank van der Kley, Marcel A.M. Beijk, Ronak Delewi, J. van den Nieuwendijk, Ibtihal Al Amri, Danielle Robbers-Visser
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Residual shunt is a known complication in percutaneous patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure, and moderate to large residual shunt has been associated with an increased risk of recurrent stroke. Device-related factors, such as device size, have been associated with residual shunt, but comparative data per device type are scarce. AIMS: We compared the prevalence of moderate to large residual shunt at 6 months between the Amplatzer and Occlutech devices. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, patients undergoing successful percutaneous PFO closure with an Amplatzer or Occlutech dedicated closure device within the CAHAL centers Amsterdam UMC and Leiden UMC between 2018 and 2024 were included. The study population was divided into patients treated with an Occlutech and an Amplatzer device. The prevalence of moderate/large residual shunt at 6 months of follow-up was compared between the two groups. As a sensitivity analysis, a logistic regression was conducted to determine the association between the treatment groups and moderate/large residual shunt. The logistic regression was conducted in a weighted population using inverse probability weighting (IPTW), correcting for age, sex, smoking status, shunt size at baseline, device size, and atrial septal aneurysm. RESULTS: A total of 413 patients were included with an average age of 45.8 ± 11.3 years and 51.6% were male. Of the included patients, 279 were treated with an Amplatzer- and 134 with an Occlutech device. In the group treated with an Amplatzer, 22.2% of the patients had a moderate or large residual shunt at 6 months compared to 14.9% in the Occlutech group (p = 0.11). The sensitivity analysis did not show an association between device type and moderate/large shunt OR 0.71 (95% CI: 0.39-1.28, p = 0.25). CONCLUSION: In this study, no significant difference was observed in moderate/large residual shunt prevalence at 6 months of follow-up between the Occlutech and Amplatzer devices.

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Cardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon