EFFECT OF FREE WEIGHTS VERSUS MACHINE BASED RESISTANCE TRAINING ALONG WITH PLYOMETRICS ON VERTICAL JUMP PERFORMANCE AND DYNAMIC BALANCE AMONG COLLEGIATE VOLLEYBALL PLAYERS

Background: Volleyball performance requires lower-limb strength, power, and dynamic balance due to repeated jumping and rapid directional changes. Resistance training combined with plyometrics is widely used to develop these qualities; however, comparisons of free-weight and machine-based resistance training within a non-linear periodization framework remain limited. Objective: To compare free-weight resistance training with plyometrics versus machine-based resistance training with plyometrics on vertical jump performance and dynamic balance in collegiate volleyball players. Methods: Thirty male collegiate volleyball players aged 18–23 years were purposively selected and allocated to Group A (free-weight training with plyometrics, n=15) or Group B (machine-based training with plyometrics, n=15). Both groups trained twice weekly for six weeks (50–60 minutes/session) using non-linear periodization alongside regular volleyball practice. Resistance loads were prescribed using baseline 1RM assessment and adjusted using repetitions-in-reserve (RIR). 1RM was reassessed at weeks 2 and 4 to guide progression. Vertical jump performance was assessed using the Sargent Jump Test and dynamic balance using the Y Balance Test before and after intervention. Results: Both groups showed significant pre-to-post improvements in vertical jump performance and dynamic balance (P<0.05). Group A demonstrated significantly greater improvements than Group B in vertical jump performance and anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral Y Balance Test reach directions (P<0.05). Conclusion: Both training approaches improved jump performance and dynamic balance, with greater gains following free-weight resistance training combined with plyometrics. Keywords: Collegiate volleyball players, Dynamic balance, Free-weight exercises, Machine-based resistance training, Plyometrics, Vertical jump performance.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Indian journal of physical therapy
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63299/ijopt.0704303
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EFFECT OF FREE WEIGHTS VERSUS MACHINE BASED RESISTANCE TRAINING ALONG WITH PLYOMETRICS ON VERTICAL JUMP PERFORMANCE AND DYNAMIC BALANCE AMONG COLLEGIATE VOLLEYBALL PLAYERS

Dr.Manoj Abraham Manoharlal, MPT., PhD, Nithya Nataraj, Agalyadharshini R
2 links
Indian journal of physical therapy
Sports Performance and Training
article

EFFECT OF FREE WEIGHTS VERSUS MACHINE BASED RESISTANCE TRAINING ALONG WITH PLYOMETRICS ON VERTICAL JUMP PERFORMANCE AND DYNAMIC BALANCE AMONG COLLEGIATE VOLLEYBALL PLAYERS

Dr.Manoj Abraham Manoharlal, MPT., PhD, Nithya Nataraj, Agalyadharshini R
article en

Abstract

Background: Volleyball performance requires lower-limb strength, power, and dynamic balance due to repeated jumping and rapid directional changes. Resistance training combined with plyometrics is widely used to develop these qualities; however, comparisons of free-weight and machine-based resistance training within a non-linear periodization framework remain limited. Objective: To compare free-weight resistance training with plyometrics versus machine-based resistance training with plyometrics on vertical jump performance and dynamic balance in collegiate volleyball players. Methods: Thirty male collegiate volleyball players aged 18–23 years were purposively selected and allocated to Group A (free-weight training with plyometrics, n=15) or Group B (machine-based training with plyometrics, n=15). Both groups trained twice weekly for six weeks (50–60 minutes/session) using non-linear periodization alongside regular volleyball practice. Resistance loads were prescribed using baseline 1RM assessment and adjusted using repetitions-in-reserve (RIR). 1RM was reassessed at weeks 2 and 4 to guide progression. Vertical jump performance was assessed using the Sargent Jump Test and dynamic balance using the Y Balance Test before and after intervention. Results: Both groups showed significant pre-to-post improvements in vertical jump performance and dynamic balance (P<0.05). Group A demonstrated significantly greater improvements than Group B in vertical jump performance and anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral Y Balance Test reach directions (P<0.05). Conclusion: Both training approaches improved jump performance and dynamic balance, with greater gains following free-weight resistance training combined with plyometrics. Keywords: Collegiate volleyball players, Dynamic balance, Free-weight exercises, Machine-based resistance training, Plyometrics, Vertical jump performance.

Indian journal of physical therapyVol. 7(4)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
EFFECT OF FREE WEIGHTS VERSUS MACHINE BASED RESISTANCE TRAINING ALONG WITH PLYOMETRICS ON VERTICAL JUMP PERFORMANCE AND DYNAMIC BALANCE AMONG COLLEGIATE VOLLEYBALL PLAYERS — Dr.Manoj Abraham Manoharlal, MPT., PhD, Nithya Nataraj, et al. · Indian journal of physical therapy (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS