Supporting MedTech Innovation in Australia: The Role of the Therapeutic Goods Administration

Australia has recognised strengths in MedTech, yet pivotal trials and first approvals (including for Australian-origin devices) often occur offshore. The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) is well-positioned to further support local innovation while maintaining confidence in the medical devices approved for use by shifting effort earlier in development. We outline the current landscape of risk-based regulation across the medical device lifecycle and frame the issues for clinicians during an upcoming period of active discussion and consultation. The existing priority review pathway could be refined for devices under development. Targeted early access approaches must recognise unmet needs and carefully weigh uncertainties around safety and performance. Internationally, regulators increasingly act as collaborators as well as adjudicators of innovation, helped by targeted programs. The TGA aims for an optimised regulatory system that responsibly facilitates access by Australians to MedTech innovation, while aligning timelines with clinical need and sustaining public trust.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Medical Journal of Australia
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.70283
Primary Topic
Healthcare Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Supporting MedTech Innovation in Australia: The Role of the Therapeutic Goods Administration

Kyle Alexander Sheldrick, Christine E. Gee, David Tak-Wai Hau, Jeffrey J Brownscombe et al.
The Medical Journal of Australia
Healthcare Regulation
article

Supporting MedTech Innovation in Australia: The Role of the Therapeutic Goods Administration

Kyle Alexander Sheldrick, Christine E. Gee, David Tak-Wai Hau, Jeffrey J Brownscombe, Mario E. Vittorino, Tracey L. Duffy
article en

Abstract

Australia has recognised strengths in MedTech, yet pivotal trials and first approvals (including for Australian-origin devices) often occur offshore. The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) is well-positioned to further support local innovation while maintaining confidence in the medical devices approved for use by shifting effort earlier in development. We outline the current landscape of risk-based regulation across the medical device lifecycle and frame the issues for clinicians during an upcoming period of active discussion and consultation. The existing priority review pathway could be refined for devices under development. Targeted early access approaches must recognise unmet needs and carefully weigh uncertainties around safety and performance. Internationally, regulators increasingly act as collaborators as well as adjudicators of innovation, helped by targeted programs. The TGA aims for an optimised regulatory system that responsibly facilitates access by Australians to MedTech innovation, while aligning timelines with clinical need and sustaining public trust.

The Medical Journal of AustraliaVol. 224(11)
Good health and well-being, Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Healthcare Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon