Removal v. Refuge: Pakistan's Obligations Towards Afghan Children Outside the Refugee Convention

On 28 June 2026, Pakistan’s Interior Ministry directed the detention and deportation of Afghan nationals without valid documentation from 10 July. Pakistan is not a party to the 1951 Refugee Convention, and many affected children hold no recognised status. This paper argues that Pakistan nonetheless remains bound by the Convention on the Rights of the Child and by the principle of non-refoulement, and that these require an individual best-interests assessment before any child is removed. Drawing on treaty texts, Pakistani court decisions, and UN and NGO reporting, it examines two groups: children born in Pakistan to Afghan parents, whose claims under Section 4 of the Citizenship Act 1951 are unsettled across the High Courts, and unaccompanied or separated children, for whom the available reporting raises concerns that removals proceed without a documented assessment. It addresses counterarguments based on sovereignty, security and burden-sharing, and proposes a minimum procedure for removals involving children.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23857192
Primary Topic
Migration, Racism, and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Removal v. Refuge: Pakistan's Obligations Towards Afghan Children Outside the Refugee Convention

Ayaan Jehania
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Migration, Racism, and Human Rights
article

Removal v. Refuge: Pakistan's Obligations Towards Afghan Children Outside the Refugee Convention

Ayaan Jehania
article en

Abstract

On 28 June 2026, Pakistan’s Interior Ministry directed the detention and deportation of Afghan nationals without valid documentation from 10 July. Pakistan is not a party to the 1951 Refugee Convention, and many affected children hold no recognised status. This paper argues that Pakistan nonetheless remains bound by the Convention on the Rights of the Child and by the principle of non-refoulement, and that these require an individual best-interests assessment before any child is removed. Drawing on treaty texts, Pakistani court decisions, and UN and NGO reporting, it examines two groups: children born in Pakistan to Afghan parents, whose claims under Section 4 of the Citizenship Act 1951 are unsettled across the High Courts, and unaccompanied or separated children, for whom the available reporting raises concerns that removals proceed without a documented assessment. It addresses counterarguments based on sovereignty, security and burden-sharing, and proposes a minimum procedure for removals involving children.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Migration, Racism, and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon