Decentralizing for Better Governance: How Fiscal Autonomy Shapes Institutional Quality?

This study investigates how fiscal decentralization shapes institutional quality in Pakistan, situating the discussion within the broader framework of fiscal federalism, democratic processes, and regional inequality. Using a secondary time series data from 1996 to 2023 with econometric modeling based on the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) approach, the study evaluates institutional quality through indicators such as rule of law, political stability, government effectiveness, accountability, and control of corruption. Findings indicate that fiscal decentralization has the potential to enhance institutional quality, but its success depends on complementary conditions, including human capital development, openness to trade, economic growth, and price stability. Conversely, decentralization that is poorly structured or weakly enforced may aggravate corruption, inefficiency, and deficiencies in service delivery. Policy recommendations emphasize expanding fiscal autonomy, reinforcing accountability mechanisms, and addressing regional disparities to promote inclusive growth and stronger institutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Global Social Transformation
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71317/jgst.2.11.2026.943
Primary Topic
Local Government Finance and Decentralization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decentralizing for Better Governance: How Fiscal Autonomy Shapes Institutional Quality?

Farhan Ahmed, Rafique Ur Rehman Memon
1 links
Journal of Global Social Transformation
Local Government Finance and Decentralization
article

Decentralizing for Better Governance: How Fiscal Autonomy Shapes Institutional Quality?

Farhan Ahmed, Rafique Ur Rehman Memon
article en

Abstract

This study investigates how fiscal decentralization shapes institutional quality in Pakistan, situating the discussion within the broader framework of fiscal federalism, democratic processes, and regional inequality. Using a secondary time series data from 1996 to 2023 with econometric modeling based on the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) approach, the study evaluates institutional quality through indicators such as rule of law, political stability, government effectiveness, accountability, and control of corruption. Findings indicate that fiscal decentralization has the potential to enhance institutional quality, but its success depends on complementary conditions, including human capital development, openness to trade, economic growth, and price stability. Conversely, decentralization that is poorly structured or weakly enforced may aggravate corruption, inefficiency, and deficiencies in service delivery. Policy recommendations emphasize expanding fiscal autonomy, reinforcing accountability mechanisms, and addressing regional disparities to promote inclusive growth and stronger institutions.

Journal of Global Social TransformationVol. 2(11)
NED University of Engineering and Technology (PK), University of Almería (ES)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Local Government Finance and Decentralization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon