Balloon-Blowing Versus Deep Breathing Exercises for Dyspnea in Pediatric Congenital Heart Diseases: A Randomized Controlled Study

Objective: To compare balloon-blowing and standard deep-breathing exercises for reducing dyspnea in children with congenital heart disease Study Design: Multicenter, parallel randomized controlled studyPlace and Duration of Study: This study was conducted at the Bent Al-Huda Teaching Hospital, Mohammed AlMousawi Children’s Hospital and Nasiriyah Heart Hospital in Al-Naseria City, Iraq, from 15th March 2026 to 14th June 2026. Methodology: Sixty-three children were equally allocated to balloon blowing (n=21), deep breathing (n=21), or control (n=21). Data were collected using a structured questionnaire, clinical assessment, and the Modified Borg Dyspnea Scale. Results: Most participants were aged 3–5 years, with no significant age difference between groups (χ²=0.41, p=0.982). Sex distribution was comparable. Ventricular septal defects occurred in 28.6% of children in both the balloon-blowing and control groups. Baseline dyspnea scores did not differ significantly (χ²=0.18, p=0.914). At 30 minutes post-exercise, a significant difference in dyspnea was observed among the three groups (χ²=10.92, p<0.004). Conclusion: Balloon blowing and deep breathing showed comparable effectiveness in reducing dyspnea, with no significant difference between the two techniques. Both may be incorporated into routine respiratory care for children with congenital heart disease.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Forum Monthly
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.60110/medforum.37.10.15
Primary Topic
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Balloon-Blowing Versus Deep Breathing Exercises for Dyspnea in Pediatric Congenital Heart Diseases: A Randomized Controlled Study

Khatam Mutasher Hattab, Marwa Nayef Khassaf Abass
Medical Forum Monthly
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
article

Balloon-Blowing Versus Deep Breathing Exercises for Dyspnea in Pediatric Congenital Heart Diseases: A Randomized Controlled Study

Khatam Mutasher Hattab, Marwa Nayef Khassaf Abass
article en

Abstract

Objective: To compare balloon-blowing and standard deep-breathing exercises for reducing dyspnea in children with congenital heart disease Study Design: Multicenter, parallel randomized controlled studyPlace and Duration of Study: This study was conducted at the Bent Al-Huda Teaching Hospital, Mohammed AlMousawi Children’s Hospital and Nasiriyah Heart Hospital in Al-Naseria City, Iraq, from 15th March 2026 to 14th June 2026. Methodology: Sixty-three children were equally allocated to balloon blowing (n=21), deep breathing (n=21), or control (n=21). Data were collected using a structured questionnaire, clinical assessment, and the Modified Borg Dyspnea Scale. Results: Most participants were aged 3–5 years, with no significant age difference between groups (χ²=0.41, p=0.982). Sex distribution was comparable. Ventricular septal defects occurred in 28.6% of children in both the balloon-blowing and control groups. Baseline dyspnea scores did not differ significantly (χ²=0.18, p=0.914). At 30 minutes post-exercise, a significant difference in dyspnea was observed among the three groups (χ²=10.92, p<0.004). Conclusion: Balloon blowing and deep breathing showed comparable effectiveness in reducing dyspnea, with no significant difference between the two techniques. Both may be incorporated into routine respiratory care for children with congenital heart disease.

Medical Forum MonthlyVol. 37(10)
University of Baghdad (IQ)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon