Internal Medicine-Led Multidisciplinary Co-Management is Associated with Improved Perioperative Outcomes in Elderly Patients with Hip Fracture: A Propensity Score Matched Study

Background: Hip fractures in the elderly are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. We compared perioperative outcomes between an internal medicine-led multidisciplinary co-management (IM) model and the traditional orthopedic-led consultation (OC) model in elderly hip fracture patients. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at Beijing Jishuitan Hospital Guizhou Hospital from March 2023 to June 2025, enrolling 1095 patients aged ≥ 65 years with hip fractures (IM, n=872; OC, n=223). Propensity score matching (2:1 optimal maximum matching; caliper 0.45 on the logit of the propensity score) balanced 13 covariates, with exact matching for sex, fracture type, and renal insufficiency. Multivariate regression evaluated associations between the care model and perioperative outcomes. Results: After matching, all 223 OC patients were successfully matched (final cohort 668: 445 IM, 223 OC), with all covariates achieving SMD < 0.1 (maximum 0.078). The IM group showed shorter hospital stay (10.0 vs 14.3 days), shorter time to surgery (42.3 vs 110.1 hours), less blood loss, and lower costs (all p < 0.001). Surgery within 48 hours was more frequent (70.3% vs 8.5%, p < 0.001), and allogeneic transfusion (49.4% vs 68.2%, p < 0.001) and one-year mortality (7.0% vs 12.6%, p = 0.016) were lower in the IM group. Multivariate analysis confirmed an independent association with lower mortality (OR 0.492, 95% CI 0.280– 0.863, p = 0.013). Conclusion: Internal medicine-led multidisciplinary co-management may be associated with shorter preoperative waiting time and hospital stay, reduced blood loss, allogeneic transfusion, one-year mortality, and medical costs. This model may serve as a reference strategy for perioperative management of geriatric hip fracture where multidisciplinary internal medicine resources are available; multicenter prospective studies are warranted. Keywords: geriatric hip fracture, internal medicine-led, multidisciplinary team, propensity score matching, mortality

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of General Medicine
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2147/ijgm.s651287
Primary Topic
Hip and Femur Fractures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Internal Medicine-Led Multidisciplinary Co-Management is Associated with Improved Perioperative Outcomes in Elderly Patients with Hip Fracture: A Propensity Score Matched Study

Yingying Deng, Chao Feng, Tao Wang, Yuan Pan et al.
International Journal of General Medicine
Hip and Femur Fractures
article

Internal Medicine-Led Multidisciplinary Co-Management is Associated with Improved Perioperative Outcomes in Elderly Patients with Hip Fracture: A Propensity Score Matched Study

Yingying Deng, Chao Feng, Tao Wang, Yuan Pan, Min An, Yabo Liu
article en

Abstract

Background: Hip fractures in the elderly are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. We compared perioperative outcomes between an internal medicine-led multidisciplinary co-management (IM) model and the traditional orthopedic-led consultation (OC) model in elderly hip fracture patients. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at Beijing Jishuitan Hospital Guizhou Hospital from March 2023 to June 2025, enrolling 1095 patients aged ≥ 65 years with hip fractures (IM, n=872; OC, n=223). Propensity score matching (2:1 optimal maximum matching; caliper 0.45 on the logit of the propensity score) balanced 13 covariates, with exact matching for sex, fracture type, and renal insufficiency. Multivariate regression evaluated associations between the care model and perioperative outcomes. Results: After matching, all 223 OC patients were successfully matched (final cohort 668: 445 IM, 223 OC), with all covariates achieving SMD < 0.1 (maximum 0.078). The IM group showed shorter hospital stay (10.0 vs 14.3 days), shorter time to surgery (42.3 vs 110.1 hours), less blood loss, and lower costs (all p < 0.001). Surgery within 48 hours was more frequent (70.3% vs 8.5%, p < 0.001), and allogeneic transfusion (49.4% vs 68.2%, p < 0.001) and one-year mortality (7.0% vs 12.6%, p = 0.016) were lower in the IM group. Multivariate analysis confirmed an independent association with lower mortality (OR 0.492, 95% CI 0.280– 0.863, p = 0.013). Conclusion: Internal medicine-led multidisciplinary co-management may be associated with shorter preoperative waiting time and hospital stay, reduced blood loss, allogeneic transfusion, one-year mortality, and medical costs. This model may serve as a reference strategy for perioperative management of geriatric hip fracture where multidisciplinary internal medicine resources are available; multicenter prospective studies are warranted. Keywords: geriatric hip fracture, internal medicine-led, multidisciplinary team, propensity score matching, mortality

International Journal of General MedicineVol. Volume 19
Capital Medical University (CN), Beijing Jishuitan Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Hip and Femur Fractures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon