The 2025 Mw 7.7 Myanmar Earthquake: Finite Fault Versus Point Source in Modeling Coseismic Ionospheric Disturbances

Coseismic ionospheric disturbances (CIDs), observed in the total electron content (TEC) measured by Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receivers, are often interpreted with a point source at the epicenter. We present a three-dimensional forward model that propagates the acoustic pulse from an extended rupture to the ionosphere and returns synthetic slant TEC along each observed line of sight. The source is a moment-weighted distribution of sub-sources along the fault, each radiating at its own rupture time. Rays are traced through a moving, stratified atmosphere into the far field, with absorption and ray-tube spreading; the neutral motion is projected onto the geomagnetic field, and the electron-density perturbation follows from the three-dimensional continuity equation. We apply the model to the 28 March 2025 Mw 7.7 Myanmar earthquake, which ruptured more than 400 km south of the epicenter along an almost straight fault, ideal for isolating the effect of rupture geometry. We compare finite-fault and point-source predictions with CID arrivals identified on 249 satellite-receiver arcs. The model reproduces the shape of the disturbance and its broadening with distance. The finite fault almost halves the median timing error of the point source (202 s against 383 s) and moves the strongest response toward the southern arcs, where observed amplitudes peak. Arrival times and amplitudes are ordered by distance from the fault rather than from the epicenter, which biases epicentral travel-time analyses. Misfits that grow with distance, common to both sources, point to the modeled propagation and to Rayleigh-wave-induced arrivals in the far field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22541/essoar.15011369/v1
Primary Topic
Earthquake Detection and Analysis
Type
preprint

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

The 2025 Mw 7.7 Myanmar Earthquake: Finite Fault Versus Point Source in Modeling Coseismic Ionospheric Disturbances

Claudio Cesaroni, Marco Guerra, Luca Spogli, Elvira I. Astafyeva et al.
4 links
Earthquake Detection and Analysis
preprint

The 2025 Mw 7.7 Myanmar Earthquake: Finite Fault Versus Point Source in Modeling Coseismic Ionospheric Disturbances

Claudio Cesaroni, Marco Guerra, Luca Spogli, Elvira I. Astafyeva, Ines Dahlia Ouar
preprint en

Abstract

Coseismic ionospheric disturbances (CIDs), observed in the total electron content (TEC) measured by Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receivers, are often interpreted with a point source at the epicenter. We present a three-dimensional forward model that propagates the acoustic pulse from an extended rupture to the ionosphere and returns synthetic slant TEC along each observed line of sight. The source is a moment-weighted distribution of sub-sources along the fault, each radiating at its own rupture time. Rays are traced through a moving, stratified atmosphere into the far field, with absorption and ray-tube spreading; the neutral motion is projected onto the geomagnetic field, and the electron-density perturbation follows from the three-dimensional continuity equation. We apply the model to the 28 March 2025 Mw 7.7 Myanmar earthquake, which ruptured more than 400 km south of the epicenter along an almost straight fault, ideal for isolating the effect of rupture geometry. We compare finite-fault and point-source predictions with CID arrivals identified on 249 satellite-receiver arcs. The model reproduces the shape of the disturbance and its broadening with distance. The finite fault almost halves the median timing error of the point source (202 s against 383 s) and moves the strongest response toward the southern arcs, where observed amplitudes peak. Arrival times and amplitudes are ordered by distance from the fault rather than from the epicenter, which biases epicentral travel-time analyses. Misfits that grow with distance, common to both sources, point to the modeled propagation and to Rayleigh-wave-induced arrivals in the far field.

Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Institut de physique du globe de Paris (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (IT)
Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of Calcutta, Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, U.S. Geological Survey, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Earthquake Detection and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon