Language policy in the Timurid period and the status of the Turkic language

Studying the historical roots of the Uzbek literary language and its place in state and social life is necessary for scholarly grounding of present-day language policy. The Timurid period (1370-1507) is especially relevant, since Turkic then rose from a dynastic and military language to a classical literary language. The period’s language situation has mostly been studied from a literary perspective, leaving language policy insufficiently explored. The article analyses the status of Turkic alongside Arabic and Persian and court language practice. The study draws on chronicles, inscriptions, manuscripts copied by bakhshis, yarliqs and letters, and data on madrasa education. It shows that Arabic served religion and genealogy, Persian served the chancery and monumental inscriptions, and Turkic was the language of the dynasty, the army, yarliqs and the bakhshis’ book culture. In the fifteenth century Turkic became a literary language through court patronage, a process theorised in the treatise “Muhakamat al-lughatayn”.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Лингвоспектр
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23861182
Primary Topic
Linguistics and Cultural Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Language policy in the Timurid period and the status of the Turkic language

Zokir Maxmudovich Baynazarov
1 links
Лингвоспектр
Linguistics and Cultural Studies
article

Language policy in the Timurid period and the status of the Turkic language

Zokir Maxmudovich Baynazarov
article en

Abstract

Studying the historical roots of the Uzbek literary language and its place in state and social life is necessary for scholarly grounding of present-day language policy. The Timurid period (1370-1507) is especially relevant, since Turkic then rose from a dynastic and military language to a classical literary language. The period’s language situation has mostly been studied from a literary perspective, leaving language policy insufficiently explored. The article analyses the status of Turkic alongside Arabic and Persian and court language practice. The study draws on chronicles, inscriptions, manuscripts copied by bakhshis, yarliqs and letters, and data on madrasa education. It shows that Arabic served religion and genealogy, Persian served the chancery and monumental inscriptions, and Turkic was the language of the dynasty, the army, yarliqs and the bakhshis’ book culture. In the fifteenth century Turkic became a literary language through court patronage, a process theorised in the treatise “Muhakamat al-lughatayn”.

Лингвоспектр
Samarkand State University named after Sharof Rashidov (UZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Linguistics and Cultural Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Language policy in the Timurid period and the status of the Turkic language — Zokir Maxmudovich Baynazarov · Лингвоспектр (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS