MAQASID AL-SHARIAH IN THE AGE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: RECONSTRUCTING ISLAMIC ETHICAL PRINCIPLES FOR DIGITAL MUSLIM SOCIETIES

Artificial intelligence (AI) now mediates how Muslims learn, work, transact, and seek religious guidance, yet the ethical principles that govern it have been written largely outside the Islamic intellectual tradition. This conceptual paper argues that maqasid al-shariah (the higher objectives of Islamic law) can serve as a coherent ethical architecture for AI, but only if the classical objectives are reconstructed rather than merely restated. Using a qualitative design that combines document analysis with thematic synthesis, the paper examines three bodies of material: classical and contemporary maqasid scholarship, peer-reviewed work on Islamic AI ethics published between 2020 and 2026, and current governance instruments, including the UNESCO Recommendation, the European Union AI Act, and Malaysia's National Guidelines on AI Governance and Ethics. The analysis shows that existing scholarship agrees on the relevance of the maqasid but remains divided on three questions: whether maslahah should be read in utility-based or duty-based terms, whether Islamic ethics should complement or replace prevailing AI principles, and who holds interpretive authority when algorithms generate religious content. It also finds a persistent gap between normative statements and operational tools. The paper responds by re-specifying the five essential objectives (religion, life, intellect, lineage, and property) for algorithmic conditions, adding dignity and justice as cross-cutting objectives, and proposing a three-tier maqasid impact assessment that ranks AI harms and benefits as essential, complementary, or embellishing. Recommendations are offered for scholars, regulators, developers, and universities in Muslim-majority societies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Islamic Theology & Civilization
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23310259
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MAQASID AL-SHARIAH IN THE AGE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: RECONSTRUCTING ISLAMIC ETHICAL PRINCIPLES FOR DIGITAL MUSLIM SOCIETIES

Mazzlida Mat Deli
3 links
International Journal of Islamic Theology & Civilization
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

MAQASID AL-SHARIAH IN THE AGE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: RECONSTRUCTING ISLAMIC ETHICAL PRINCIPLES FOR DIGITAL MUSLIM SOCIETIES

Mazzlida Mat Deli
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) now mediates how Muslims learn, work, transact, and seek religious guidance, yet the ethical principles that govern it have been written largely outside the Islamic intellectual tradition. This conceptual paper argues that maqasid al-shariah (the higher objectives of Islamic law) can serve as a coherent ethical architecture for AI, but only if the classical objectives are reconstructed rather than merely restated. Using a qualitative design that combines document analysis with thematic synthesis, the paper examines three bodies of material: classical and contemporary maqasid scholarship, peer-reviewed work on Islamic AI ethics published between 2020 and 2026, and current governance instruments, including the UNESCO Recommendation, the European Union AI Act, and Malaysia's National Guidelines on AI Governance and Ethics. The analysis shows that existing scholarship agrees on the relevance of the maqasid but remains divided on three questions: whether maslahah should be read in utility-based or duty-based terms, whether Islamic ethics should complement or replace prevailing AI principles, and who holds interpretive authority when algorithms generate religious content. It also finds a persistent gap between normative statements and operational tools. The paper responds by re-specifying the five essential objectives (religion, life, intellect, lineage, and property) for algorithmic conditions, adding dignity and justice as cross-cutting objectives, and proposing a three-tier maqasid impact assessment that ranks AI harms and benefits as essential, complementary, or embellishing. Recommendations are offered for scholars, regulators, developers, and universities in Muslim-majority societies.

International Journal of Islamic Theology & Civilization
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon