Understanding What Reduces Academic Misconduct Intention Among College Students in the AI Era

The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) has created new challenges for academic integrity in higher education. Although previous studies have primarily examined academic misconduct among university students, less attention has been paid to college students and the factors that may mitigate their intentions to engage in such misconduct. Accordingly, this study examines the relationships between four factors and college students’ intentions to violate academic integrity in the context of AI use. A survey was conducted with 358 college students in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. The data were analyzed using Cronbach’s alpha, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), Pearson’s correlation analysis, and multiple linear regression. The results indicate that perceived risk, perceived behavioral control, and attitudes toward academic misconduct are significantly and negatively associated with misconduct intentions, whereas subjective norms are not statistically significant. Perceived risk exhibits the strongest negative association with misconduct intentions (β = −0.514). This study contributes empirical evidence from a college student population and extends the application of the theory of planned behavior (TPB) by incorporating perceived risk alongside its original components. The findings suggest that educational institutions should establish clearer academic integrity policies, communicate the consequences of misconduct, and provide students with practical guidance on the acceptable use of AI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dong Thap University Journal of Science
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52714/dthu.ajes.23.2051
Primary Topic
Academic integrity and plagiarism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding What Reduces Academic Misconduct Intention Among College Students in the AI Era

Nguyễn Phong Luân Phan
1 links
Dong Thap University Journal of Science
Academic integrity and plagiarism
article

Understanding What Reduces Academic Misconduct Intention Among College Students in the AI Era

Nguyễn Phong Luân Phan
article en

Abstract

The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) has created new challenges for academic integrity in higher education. Although previous studies have primarily examined academic misconduct among university students, less attention has been paid to college students and the factors that may mitigate their intentions to engage in such misconduct. Accordingly, this study examines the relationships between four factors and college students’ intentions to violate academic integrity in the context of AI use. A survey was conducted with 358 college students in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. The data were analyzed using Cronbach’s alpha, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), Pearson’s correlation analysis, and multiple linear regression. The results indicate that perceived risk, perceived behavioral control, and attitudes toward academic misconduct are significantly and negatively associated with misconduct intentions, whereas subjective norms are not statistically significant. Perceived risk exhibits the strongest negative association with misconduct intentions (β = −0.514). This study contributes empirical evidence from a college student population and extends the application of the theory of planned behavior (TPB) by incorporating perceived risk alongside its original components. The findings suggest that educational institutions should establish clearer academic integrity policies, communicate the consequences of misconduct, and provide students with practical guidance on the acceptable use of AI.

Dong Thap University Journal of ScienceVol. 1(3)
Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Engineering (VN)
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Academic integrity and plagiarism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon