Reported Occupational Health Hazards and Perceived Health Effects Among Oil and Gas Workers in Degema Local Government Area, Rivers State, Nigeria: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background: Oil and gas operations expose workers to chemical, physical, mechanical and psychosocial hazards, but facility-level evidence on how workers’ reported hazards relate to their perceived health effects in Degema Local Government Area, Rivers State, is limited. This study assessed reported occupational health hazards and perceived health effects among oil and gas workers and tested the relationship between them. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted at the Awoba and Cawthorne Channel flow stations. Of 250 questionnaires administered, 239 were retrieved fully completed (response rate 95.6%) and analysed. Data were collected with the Occupational Health Hazards Questionnaire, scored on a four-point Likert scale with a criterion mean of 2.50 (test–retest reliability r = 0.82). Data were analysed with SPSS version 25 using frequencies, percentages, means, standard deviations and Pearson product–moment correlation at the 0.05 level of significance. Results: Most respondents were male (87.9%). Workers agreed with all six hazard statements (grand mean = 2.94, SD = 0.75), with radiation exposure (M = 3.49) and physical injuries (M = 3.19) rated highest. They also agreed with all seven perceived health-effect statements (grand mean = 2.86, SD = 0.87), with fatigue and reduced concentration from long working hours (M = 3.24) and effects of job demands on mood and emotional well-being (M = 3.14) rated highest. Reported hazards were weakly but significantly correlated with perceived health effects (r = .167, p = .010). Conclusion: Oil and gas workers in Degema reported a wide range of occupational hazards and associated health effects, and higher hazard reports were associated with higher perceived health effects. Task-specific hazard assessment, objective exposure monitoring, review of working hours and occupational health surveillance with referral are recommended.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Public Health Policy and Society
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54117/gvphcz98
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reported Occupational Health Hazards and Perceived Health Effects Among Oil and Gas Workers in Degema Local Government Area, Rivers State, Nigeria: A Cross-Sectional Study

Tamunotonye W. Jacks, Aleruchi Lenchi Oji, Florence Uche OPARANMA, Mercy David Opriye
2 links
Journal of Public Health Policy and Society
Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
article

Reported Occupational Health Hazards and Perceived Health Effects Among Oil and Gas Workers in Degema Local Government Area, Rivers State, Nigeria: A Cross-Sectional Study

Tamunotonye W. Jacks, Aleruchi Lenchi Oji, Florence Uche OPARANMA, Mercy David Opriye
article en

Abstract

Background: Oil and gas operations expose workers to chemical, physical, mechanical and psychosocial hazards, but facility-level evidence on how workers’ reported hazards relate to their perceived health effects in Degema Local Government Area, Rivers State, is limited. This study assessed reported occupational health hazards and perceived health effects among oil and gas workers and tested the relationship between them. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted at the Awoba and Cawthorne Channel flow stations. Of 250 questionnaires administered, 239 were retrieved fully completed (response rate 95.6%) and analysed. Data were collected with the Occupational Health Hazards Questionnaire, scored on a four-point Likert scale with a criterion mean of 2.50 (test–retest reliability r = 0.82). Data were analysed with SPSS version 25 using frequencies, percentages, means, standard deviations and Pearson product–moment correlation at the 0.05 level of significance. Results: Most respondents were male (87.9%). Workers agreed with all six hazard statements (grand mean = 2.94, SD = 0.75), with radiation exposure (M = 3.49) and physical injuries (M = 3.19) rated highest. They also agreed with all seven perceived health-effect statements (grand mean = 2.86, SD = 0.87), with fatigue and reduced concentration from long working hours (M = 3.24) and effects of job demands on mood and emotional well-being (M = 3.14) rated highest. Reported hazards were weakly but significantly correlated with perceived health effects (r = .167, p = .010). Conclusion: Oil and gas workers in Degema reported a wide range of occupational hazards and associated health effects, and higher hazard reports were associated with higher perceived health effects. Task-specific hazard assessment, objective exposure monitoring, review of working hours and occupational health surveillance with referral are recommended.

Journal of Public Health Policy and SocietyVol. 3(4)
Rivers State University (NG)
Good health and well-being, Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon