Engineering vascularized 3D printed scaffolds for bone regeneration through design and biofunctionalization toward clinical translation

The regeneration of critical-sized bone defects remains limited by the inability of current scaffolds to support effective and functional vascularization. Three-dimensional (3D) printing has been used as a fabrication approach to design scaffolds with controlled architecture, mechanical properties, and spatial distribution of bioactive molecules. However, significant gaps persist between experimental results and clinical translation. This review analyzes the biological and engineering challenges associated with vascularizing 3D-printed scaffolds for bone regeneration. A distinction is first established between structural vascularization, defined by the presence of endothelial markers and vessel-like structures, and functional vascularization, characterized by perfusable, anastomosed, and hemodynamically stable networks that sustain long-term tissue survival. Special attention is given to four critical limitations: the oversimplification of vascular architecture in current scaffold designs, the inadequate spatiotemporal control of angiogenic signaling, the disparity between promising in vitro results and poor in vivo integration, and the absence of standardized criteria for vascularization assessment. Osteogenic–angiogenic coupling, immune regulation through osteoimmunomodulation, and additive manufacturing technologies, including extrusion-based bioprinting, stereolithography (SLA), and selective laser sintering (SLS), are discussed in the context of these limitations. Emerging approaches, including computational vascular modeling, stimuli-responsive delivery systems, and hybrid bioprinting strategies, are also examined. This analysis indicates that reproducible strategies capable of generating hierarchical, perfusable, immunocompatible, and mechanically stable vascular networks are still needed to improve the clinical applicability of vascularized scaffolds for the repair of large bone defects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Materials
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43939-026-01028-0
Primary Topic
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Engineering vascularized 3D printed scaffolds for bone regeneration through design and biofunctionalization toward clinical translation

Gabriela Torres, Aldo Yair Tenorio-Barajas, Ramón Román‐Doval, Tabata E. Anton-Guzman et al.
2 links
Discover Materials
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
article

Engineering vascularized 3D printed scaffolds for bone regeneration through design and biofunctionalization toward clinical translation

Gabriela Torres, Aldo Yair Tenorio-Barajas, Ramón Román‐Doval, Tabata E. Anton-Guzman, Carlos I. Cortes-Martínez
article en

Abstract

The regeneration of critical-sized bone defects remains limited by the inability of current scaffolds to support effective and functional vascularization. Three-dimensional (3D) printing has been used as a fabrication approach to design scaffolds with controlled architecture, mechanical properties, and spatial distribution of bioactive molecules. However, significant gaps persist between experimental results and clinical translation. This review analyzes the biological and engineering challenges associated with vascularizing 3D-printed scaffolds for bone regeneration. A distinction is first established between structural vascularization, defined by the presence of endothelial markers and vessel-like structures, and functional vascularization, characterized by perfusable, anastomosed, and hemodynamically stable networks that sustain long-term tissue survival. Special attention is given to four critical limitations: the oversimplification of vascular architecture in current scaffold designs, the inadequate spatiotemporal control of angiogenic signaling, the disparity between promising in vitro results and poor in vivo integration, and the absence of standardized criteria for vascularization assessment. Osteogenic–angiogenic coupling, immune regulation through osteoimmunomodulation, and additive manufacturing technologies, including extrusion-based bioprinting, stereolithography (SLA), and selective laser sintering (SLS), are discussed in the context of these limitations. Emerging approaches, including computational vascular modeling, stimuli-responsive delivery systems, and hybrid bioprinting strategies, are also examined. This analysis indicates that reproducible strategies capable of generating hierarchical, perfusable, immunocompatible, and mechanically stable vascular networks are still needed to improve the clinical applicability of vascularized scaffolds for the repair of large bone defects.

Discover Materials
Tecnológico Nacional de México (MX), Instituto Politécnico Nacional (MX), Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (MX)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon