Liposomal irinotecan and capecitabine plus bevacizumab as second‐line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: A multicenter, single‐arm study

BACKGROUND: Liposomal irinotecan, characterized by its favorable pharmacologic properties and reduced systemic toxicity compared to irinotecan, has demonstrated superior therapeutic potential. This multicenter, single-arm study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of liposomal irinotecan, capecitabine, and bevacizumab as a second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: , twice daily, d1-10), and bevacizumab (5 mg/kg, d1). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate, disease control rate, duration of response, overall survival, and safety. RESULTS: Between March 2024 and July 2024, 63 patients were enrolled, with a median age of 60.0 years (range: 37.0-79.0). Among the patients who received at least one tumor assessment, the objective response rate and disease control rate were 22.9% (11/48; 95% CI, 12.0-37.3) and 89.6% (43/48; 95% CI, 77.3-96.5), respectively. With a median follow-up of 16.2 months (range: 0.5-28.5), the median progression-free survival was 8.1 months (95% CI, 7.3-8.9), and the median overall survival was 19.5 months (95% CI, 15.2-23.8). The most common grade 3 to 4 adverse events were diarrhea (12.7%), neutropenia (11.1%), and fatigue (6.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of liposomal irinotecan, capecitabine, and bevacizumab demonstrated promising antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile in patients with mCRC who had failed first-line oxaliplatin-based therapy. These results suggested that this regimen is a clinically feasible second-line treatment option for mCRC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.70671
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Liposomal irinotecan and capecitabine plus bevacizumab as second‐line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: A multicenter, single‐arm study

Tongsen Zheng, Guangyu Wang, Yanqiao Zhang, Changzheng Li et al.
6 links
Cancer
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
article

Liposomal irinotecan and capecitabine plus bevacizumab as second‐line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: A multicenter, single‐arm study

Tongsen Zheng, Guangyu Wang, Yanqiao Zhang, Changzheng Li, Xiaodong Wang, Dan Su, Chao Liu, Huiting Xu, Jiebing Tang, Zhengwen Cai
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Liposomal irinotecan, characterized by its favorable pharmacologic properties and reduced systemic toxicity compared to irinotecan, has demonstrated superior therapeutic potential. This multicenter, single-arm study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of liposomal irinotecan, capecitabine, and bevacizumab as a second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: , twice daily, d1-10), and bevacizumab (5 mg/kg, d1). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate, disease control rate, duration of response, overall survival, and safety. RESULTS: Between March 2024 and July 2024, 63 patients were enrolled, with a median age of 60.0 years (range: 37.0-79.0). Among the patients who received at least one tumor assessment, the objective response rate and disease control rate were 22.9% (11/48; 95% CI, 12.0-37.3) and 89.6% (43/48; 95% CI, 77.3-96.5), respectively. With a median follow-up of 16.2 months (range: 0.5-28.5), the median progression-free survival was 8.1 months (95% CI, 7.3-8.9), and the median overall survival was 19.5 months (95% CI, 15.2-23.8). The most common grade 3 to 4 adverse events were diarrhea (12.7%), neutropenia (11.1%), and fatigue (6.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of liposomal irinotecan, capecitabine, and bevacizumab demonstrated promising antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile in patients with mCRC who had failed first-line oxaliplatin-based therapy. These results suggested that this regimen is a clinically feasible second-line treatment option for mCRC.

CancerVol. 132(21)
Harbin Medical University (CN), Guangxi Medical University (CN), Shandong Tumor Hospital (CN), Third Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University (CN), Peking University Shougang Hospital (CN), Hubei Cancer Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon