Prevalence and factors associated with episiotomy among women in Eastern Uganda: A cross-sectional study

Abstract Background : The World Health Organization recommends episiotomy rates of about 10–15%. However, studies in Uganda have reported higher episiotomy rates than the WHO-recommended rate. Higher episiotomy rates may suggest overmedicalization of childbirth. The study was conducted to determine the prevalence and factors associated with episiotomy in our setting. Methods : A cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary hospital in Eastern Uganda. We recruited 370 women who had uncomplicated vaginal birth. Participants were recruited during discharge from the postnatal unit of the hospital. An interviewer-administered questionnaire was used for data collection. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess factors associated with episiotomy. Results : Nearly a third (29.7%, n = 110/370) of women sustained perineal tears during childbirth. The prevalence of episiotomy was 11.6% (43/370). The factors associated with the practice of episiotomy were the birth attendant being a doctor (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 4.28; 95% CI: 1.36–13.44), multiparity (AOR = 0.01; 95% CI: 0.03–0.34), increasing fetal head circumference (AOR = 1.51; 95% CI: 1.04–2.20), having perineal tears (AOR = 0.16; 95% CI: 0.06–0.48), and labor augmentation (AOR = 2.92; 95% CI: 1.14–7.48). Conclusion : Episiotomy rates were within the WHO-recommended range. Episiotomy was associated with parity, type of birth attendant, fetal head circumference, perineal tears, and use of labor augmentation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11078117/v1
Primary Topic
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Type
preprint

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Prevalence and factors associated with episiotomy among women in Eastern Uganda: A cross-sectional study

Samuel Olowo, Joshua Epuitai, Rose Chalo Nabirye, Madeline Powers et al.
1 links
Research Square
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
preprint

Prevalence and factors associated with episiotomy among women in Eastern Uganda: A cross-sectional study

Samuel Olowo, Joshua Epuitai, Rose Chalo Nabirye, Madeline Powers, Juliet Taaka
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract Background : The World Health Organization recommends episiotomy rates of about 10–15%. However, studies in Uganda have reported higher episiotomy rates than the WHO-recommended rate. Higher episiotomy rates may suggest overmedicalization of childbirth. The study was conducted to determine the prevalence and factors associated with episiotomy in our setting. Methods : A cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary hospital in Eastern Uganda. We recruited 370 women who had uncomplicated vaginal birth. Participants were recruited during discharge from the postnatal unit of the hospital. An interviewer-administered questionnaire was used for data collection. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess factors associated with episiotomy. Results : Nearly a third (29.7%, n = 110/370) of women sustained perineal tears during childbirth. The prevalence of episiotomy was 11.6% (43/370). The factors associated with the practice of episiotomy were the birth attendant being a doctor (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 4.28; 95% CI: 1.36–13.44), multiparity (AOR = 0.01; 95% CI: 0.03–0.34), increasing fetal head circumference (AOR = 1.51; 95% CI: 1.04–2.20), having perineal tears (AOR = 0.16; 95% CI: 0.06–0.48), and labor augmentation (AOR = 2.92; 95% CI: 1.14–7.48). Conclusion : Episiotomy rates were within the WHO-recommended range. Episiotomy was associated with parity, type of birth attendant, fetal head circumference, perineal tears, and use of labor augmentation.

Research Square
Busitema University (UG)
Busitema University
Good health and well-being
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon